지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The comparability between oral proficiency interviews (OPI) and semidirect oral proficiency interviews (SOPI) has been an important issue since the advent of the SOPI as an alternative to the OPI. This study examines whether the two test modes can be considered to elicit comparable performance in a foreign language test context. 15 advanced Korean learners of English were given two oral proficiency tests consisting of a matched set of tasks: one under a simulated OPI and the other under a simulated SOPI. The resulting test scores and performance samples were compared. The results showed that the scores and the performance samples from the two test modes were highly comparable. This comparability is an encouraging result since the SOPI is more practical to administer than the OPI, especially in a foreign language context.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Review of Literature
Ⅲ. Research Questions
Ⅳ. Methods
Ⅴ. Results
Ⅵ. Discussion
Ⅶ. Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-002600497