인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This paper examines Dr. Kilsung Kim"s historical-Reformed position on the doctrine of the church. It mainly consists of three parts: the background and formation of his ecclesiology, its characteristics, and its ongoing and future impact and appropriation. A special attention is paid, first of all, to the Reformed theologians in the conservative theological camp who influenced Dr. Kim most significantly in constructing and deploying his theological foundation. Notably, theologians such as J. Gresham Machen, Charles Hodge, Herman Bavinck, Geerhardus Vos, John Murray, R. B. Kuiper, and Edmund P. Clowney are frequently mentioned along with the Genevan Reformer John Calvin. Louis Berkhof, regarded as the representative of Dutch Reformed theology in America, and Hyeongyong Park the renowned Korean conservative theologian, whose major books on systematic theology are thought to draw on Louis Berkhof"s Systematic Theology, should not be disregarded. The remaining sections are alloted for discussing the essence and origin, the attributes and notes, and the purity and unity of the church. It should be noted that Dr. Kim intends to dynamically link the external marks and orders of the church with its inner essence and attributes and that in so doing he is careful not to detach the history of the church and its historical significance from its theological confession and polity. This shows why he mentions the doctrine of the church and its historical foundation and succession in the same breath consistently throughout his works. Here lies the essential or sui generis feature of Dr Kim"s ecclesiology.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-230-002748017
