지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Explored in this article is how the democratic movement activists in South Korea responded to the issue and status of national division during the 1970s, in the wake of international d tente and the first attempt e of North-South Korea Talks. International Detente mood in East Asia, the US-PRC rapprochement, and talks between two Koreas in the early 1970s were not able to make any serious improvements of the situation. On the contrary, this series of events resulted in the national division’s ‘internalization.’ The issue of Korean division, which was an international conflict before, became a conflict between North and South Korea. Under the circumstances, activists engaged in South Korean democratization movement strongly called for efforts to overcome the situation while raising various debates.
Some activists argued that national division was creating all kinds of fundamental obstacles against the progress of the Korean nation in every aspects, such as democracy, economic self-reliance, maintaining of peace, and the state’s international status. They viewed the contemporary period of Korea as a ‘division period,’ and insisted that bringing an end to the National division should be considered as the most important task that all Koreans today must address. They also said the continuation of division, a ‘divided state’ or a ‘division system’ so to speak, would ultimately limit the prospect and probability of democratization and autonomy for Koreans living in both parts of the Korean peninsula. Some activists’ perception on democracy went beyond the usual western view of it, and displayed a more progressive perspective. Some activists argued that their nationalism pursuing unification of the country should continue in the context of a third world nationalism which could eventually challenge the modern world system.
Some activists argued that national division was creating all kinds of fundamental obstacles against the progress of the Korean nation in every aspects, such as democracy, economic self-reliance, maintaining of peace, and the state’s international status. They viewed the contemporary period of Korea as a ‘division period,’ and insisted that bringing an end to the National division should be considered as the most important task that all Koreans today must address. They also said the continuation of division, a ‘divided state’ or a ‘division system’ so to speak, would ultimately limit the prospect and probability of democratization and autonomy for Koreans living in both parts of the Korean peninsula. Some activists’ perception on democracy went beyond the usual western view of it, and displayed a more progressive perspective. Some activists argued that their nationalism pursuing unification of the country should continue in the context of a third world nationalism which could eventually challenge the modern world system.
목차
머리말
1. 데탕트·남북대화와 분단시대/체제론
2. ‘선민주후통일’·‘선통일후민주’ 논쟁
3. 민족·민족주의·‘민족문제’와 분단
맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002725275