메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김은경 (대구외국어대학교)
저널정보
신영어영문학회 신영어영문학 신영어영문학 제59집
발행연도
2014.11
수록면
47 - 69 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper analyses Frankenstein through Lacanian Lack Theory, examining whether lack politics might promote a more democratic society. For Lacan, both the subject and Other are lacking. Accordingly, the lacking subject fails to identify with the Other to fill that lack. However, the fantasy that is placed over the lacking Other and offers the promise of fullness, continues to stimulate the subject to identify with the Other. Yet every Utopian fantasy produces a scapegoat to constitute itself, demanding its elimination. The contradictory nature of fantasy demonstrates its failure. In Frankenstein, Victor and Monster confirm the impossibility of utopian fantasy through their struggle. Victor attributes all his negativity to Monster, and excludes him from Being to maintain a harmonious self image. Yet Monster always reemerges to threaten him. That Victor finally dies proves any fantasy can never be preserved. Meanwhile, Victor’s dislocated power is surprisingly replaced not by that of Monster’s, but by Walton’s emerging power. Walton, abandoning his ambition to approve of the sailors’ request, displays a self critical attitude acknowledging his fallibility and better alternatives. This indicates his favorable attitude towards uncertainty that lack politics advocates as a foundation for democratic politics.

목차

인용문헌

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-002896578