지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper appraises Quentin Skinner’s approach to political thought as a social science, arguing it is like the positivism of Karl Popper yet also like a research programme with a “hard core” and auxiliary hypothesis following Imre Lakatos. These contentions are made by considering Skinner’s theory of speech acts, his belief in the objectivity of contextual evidence, and his vulnerable theory of rational intentions and action. Speech act theory delimits but does not logically necessitate the further theories of Skinner’s contextualism. The detachability of his auxiliary hypotheses allows the research programme to survive powerful criticisms of methodology in intellectual history and allows scholars to adapt theory from other social sciences, deepening and broadening the programme’s explanatory power.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Speech act theory as an analytical and ontological “hard core”
Ⅲ. Skinner’s theory of contextual evidence
Ⅳ. Testing Skinner’s theory of reasoned belief
Ⅴ. Conclusion: toward a reconfiguration of the Cambridge School
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002821936