메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제25권 제4집 통권 제48집
오류 신고하기

피인용 4

검색

    초록·키워드

    Men have designed representative system to realize “res publica” through deliberation of a legislative bill and our Consistutional law Article 40 defines legislation rights to the National Assembly, which is the decision making organization based on the representative system. Legislation process in House around ‘Sewol ferry’ disaster went differently from the purpose of representative system, though. It’s been based on the “agreement”, between the Government and the Opposition parties, not through the deliberation of each member of National Assembly. Only very few representatives from each party made up their own agreement through more than 3 times trials, still not reflecting the opinions of all the people, stakeholders of the special laws and members of the National Assembly and this kind of highly disputable bill can ruin many of other proposed laws and whole of regular proceedings, we learned again. It’s the case to show common(共) interest was pursued but public(公) was not because of the value difference between the Government and Opposition party. Under the deliberation bill, public-common interest is not “recognized” but “decided” But indispensable condition of “decision” is deliberation, which should be made through enough time and discussion on the whole House.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002822791