지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is a political analysis to explain why there is no regional court in East Asia from a comparative perspective of Europe, Latin America, and Africa. This study suggests a new hypothesis to argue that states attempt to build a regional court when they desire to achieve a deeper integration beyond a custom union in their region through the process of legal transplants. This study also argues that the process of legal transplants for creating a regional court has an important political effect of institutionalizing the non-compliance of private actors against the regulatory authority of the state. Based on the suggested new hypothesis, this study concludes that the absence of a regional court in East Asia can be explained by the nature of East Asian states as the status quo state who perceive their situations as a domain of gains. In particular, East Asian states do not have strong motivations to change their current situations of the state-society relations in which they ensure the compliance with the state regulatory authority in their domestic politics as well as the anarchical nature of international system in East Asia.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론: 경험적 퍼즐
Ⅱ. 왜 지역사법재판소를 설립하는가?: 이론과 가설
Ⅲ. 왜 동아시아 재판소는 없는가?
Ⅳ. 결론: 새로운 가설의 제안
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-300-001050177