지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第132輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 249 - 289 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2014.12.132.249
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, the poor housing condition of Germany in the 19th century was addressed and the process of solving housing problems was analyzed. This process was begun in the housing reform movement by bourgeois social reformers, which was relayed by efforts of housing supply through building societies, and finally was taken over by the government. After World War I, the housing problems became a political issue. In other words, house was recognized as something that citizens should have as a right under the banner of social state’ or socialization. Small houses were supplied for the poor people and the building cost was paid by tax such as housing rental income tax. At the same time, the penal detention right of government for the land was expanded.
A special feature of German housing politics was that the government improved housing situations by various measures rather than by directly providing public houses through a tremendous investment. First of all, the government made a housing inspector improve housing quality and standardize housing condition. And the second step was to enhance the rights of tenants and support to provide the public houses. By propagating the discourse on the publicity of housing, the government, political parties, and NGOs could suppress conservative, liberal opponents who support private ownership.
A special feature of German housing politics was that the government improved housing situations by various measures rather than by directly providing public houses through a tremendous investment. First of all, the government made a housing inspector improve housing quality and standardize housing condition. And the second step was to enhance the rights of tenants and support to provide the public houses. By propagating the discourse on the publicity of housing, the government, political parties, and NGOs could suppress conservative, liberal opponents who support private ownership.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 주거현실
3. 1차대전 이전의 주거개혁정책과 성과
4. 1차대전 이후의 주거개혁정책과 성과
5. 주거개혁의 주체들
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
바이마르 공화국 헌법론
헤르만 헬러
,
김효전
독일학연구
2014
.12
독일 바이마르 시기의 ‘보수혁명’ 담론에 나타난 시장, 국가, 민주주의 : ‘청년보수주의자’ 그룹을 중심으로
김동하
정치사상연구
2011
.11
독일 빌헬름 제국 시기의 통합적 군국주의(Integrationsmilitarismus) 연구 : 독일 해군연맹(Deutscher Flotten-Verein)의 사회통합기능을 중심으로
김태산
한국군사학논집
2015
.02
포스트 민주주의 시대의 정당성 문제 : 카를 슈미트의 합법성과 정당성 논의를 중심으로
임운택
경제와사회
2016
.09
중국 개혁기 자본의 도시, 강탈의 도시로의 이행 : 광주의 사례를 중심으로
신현방
역사비평
2016
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-374-001022559