지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 3 - 13 (11page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to compare and analyse the difference between courtyard housings of hot-humid region and hot-dry region in India, in order to identify the affection of climate on the space arrangement of housing. The study starts from the curiosity about similar space structure of Indian housings at different climate area. Indian housings usually have courtyard at the center of its plan, though the ＇Courtyard housing＇ is typical form of dry region’s house type.
Research method is comparative analysis of traditional houses of India, and the samples are selected from hot-dry city, Ahmedabad and hot-humid city, Bangalore. The conclusion is drawn through comparing main houses with traditional houses of other dry city - Jaipur ? and humid cities ? Trivandrum Nilambur. It shows that both dry and humid region＇s housings has courtyard in common, but their spatial structures are not same at all. Houses of dry region shows organically connected spatial form, in order to maximize the cooling effect of ventilation. In contrast, the plan of houses in humid region shows opened, but can be closed in any time to prevent the penetration of moisture. Both Parekh house(Ahmedabad) and Koramangala house(Bangalore) left inconvenience of its arrangement, though the ventilation of air is the most important point of sustainability in hot region. The study could be the practical reference data for advanced sustainable housings of India which may built in the future.
Research method is comparative analysis of traditional houses of India, and the samples are selected from hot-dry city, Ahmedabad and hot-humid city, Bangalore. The conclusion is drawn through comparing main houses with traditional houses of other dry city - Jaipur ? and humid cities ? Trivandrum Nilambur. It shows that both dry and humid region＇s housings has courtyard in common, but their spatial structures are not same at all. Houses of dry region shows organically connected spatial form, in order to maximize the cooling effect of ventilation. In contrast, the plan of houses in humid region shows opened, but can be closed in any time to prevent the penetration of moisture. Both Parekh house(Ahmedabad) and Koramangala house(Bangalore) left inconvenience of its arrangement, though the ventilation of air is the most important point of sustainability in hot region. The study could be the practical reference data for advanced sustainable housings of India which may built in the future.
목차
Abstact
1. 서론
2. 인도의 특성
3. 건조지역 주택의 특징
4. 습윤 지역 도시 주택의 특징
5. 건조 지역과 습윤 지역 주택 중정의 역할 비교-인도 근현대 주택 사례를 중심으로
6. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
녹색건축인증 그린리모델링 평가기준 개선방향
조행필
,
김종엽
,
김선숙
한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집
2018
.08
대한민국 녹색건축대전
조영진
건축
2018
.09
친환경 건축설계공모전의 평가 기준 및 제출 양식 분석 : AIA COTE TOP 10 건축설계공모전을 바탕으로
김진호
,
이도균
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2016
.10
부산의 미래와 녹색건축
이동현
BDI 정책포커스
2015
.09
한국과 미국 녹색건축 인증제도의 비교분석을 통한 호환성 연구 : 공동주택을 중심으로
김정곤
,
방문선
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2014
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-619-000953139