메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김상원 (국민대학교)
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제29권 4호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
31 - 60 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The world has a new Eurasian Economic Commission in Central Asia consisting of Kazakhstan, Russia and Belarus. These three Central Asian countries have formed a Single Economic Space and a Customs Union. They are aiming towards an Eurasian Economic Union in 2015 with an overall free trade area between them.
The Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) originated from the Commonwealth of Independent States. The treaty on the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Community was on agreed on October 10, 2000. A Common Economic Space for the community was launched on January 1, 2010. The Eurasian Economic Commission is the regulatory agency for the Eurasian Economic Community Common Economic Space and the Customs Union.
Other Central Asian nations have voiced their view that they would like to join the Customs Union. There is a rigorous process of accession to join. Theoretically, membership of the EEU is in Central Asia’s interest. It satisfies the former-Soviet section of Central Asia’s “multi-vector” foreign policy and acts as a counter-balance to Chinese influence in the region. However, the envisaged economic benefits have fallen short. The Customs Union was supposed to open up Central Asia manufacturing to Russian markets, but in technical regulations between Russia and Central Asia have increased costs on Central Asia’s exports to Russia. In the long-term, Central Asia is unwilling to support unfavourable economic conditions for the sake of maintaining good relations with Russia; particularly if China offers a less complicated alternative.
As China strengthens its bi-lateral relations with the five Central Asian states, and reinforces relations with Russia, third-party economic relations that could counteract Chinese investments in the region become more likely. China has been relatively quiet on its view of the EEU. Previously China was generally dismissive of negative effects of the Customs Union, but the timing of the EEU’s creation may cause quiet concern within the Chinese government. China can draw some comfort from the obvious weaknesses of the agreement.

목차

I. 서론
II. 경제통합의 이론적 고찰
III. 유라시아경제연합의 진행과 발전
IV. 유라시아연합유라시아연합 (Евразий ский Союз)으로의 전환
V. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-309-001086476