지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is the final stage of judicial review for the court to decide whether to enforce an arbitral award or not. It can be concluded from the statistical analysis, based on a sample of 98 court decisions concerning the enforcement of arbitral awards, which were made from 1993 to 2012 and were collected in open ways, that the rate of non-enforcement is obviously on the high side, that judicial reasons for non-enforcement of domestic awards are concentrated on substantive issues, and that the counterparts of foreign-related or foreign awards are generally focused on irregularity of the arbitration proceeding. It can be further found by an individual analysis of 42 cases of non-enforcement and partial-enforcement that weakness of argument and divergence of opinions permeate through the enforcement stage, including: different understandings towards the validity of arbitration agreements and the proper notice, poor interpretation techniques of contracts and law, undue review of substantive issues, and inadequate reasoning when using the public policy term.
목차
引言
一、仲裁裁??行的?本分析
二、仲裁裁?不予?行之理由分析
三、??
《?容摘要》
《Abstract》
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-316-001069945