인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 5%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
There have been voluminous researches on history of Goryeo-Mongol relationship in the past decade. And the existing research outcomes have been followed by critiques. A most representative case is Gongmin King"s anti-Yuan policy in 1356.
The rebuttals are mainly arguing that anti-Yuan factors can hardly be found in Gongmin King"s reform in 1356 and therefore it does not deserve an appreciation as a successful anti-Yuan reaction. Their grounds include: part of pro-Yuan group was participating in Gongmin King"s reform, so that the reform could not completely remove pro-Yuan group as a result, and also it could not fundamentally change Goryeo-Mongol relationship. However, these arguments mostly lack of validity in terms of applying the standard of "anti-Yuan". This is because either removing anti-Yuan party completely or bringing a fundamental change in the relationship was impossible. Moreover, among those rebuttals, some did not even fully understand the original explanation or supported themselves with materials which were not proven from historical fact.
In this paper I analyze the letter which sent to Yuan in October 1356 to reveal that Goryeo"s anti-Yuan policy was not for restoring Sejoguje but instead for breaking it and building a new relationship as a form of appointment-tribute. Meanwhile Goryeo sustained appointment-tribute relationship with Yuan, and I evaluated it as the best and the most feasible anti-Yuan policy for Goryeo to choose at that time.
The rebuttals are mainly arguing that anti-Yuan factors can hardly be found in Gongmin King"s reform in 1356 and therefore it does not deserve an appreciation as a successful anti-Yuan reaction. Their grounds include: part of pro-Yuan group was participating in Gongmin King"s reform, so that the reform could not completely remove pro-Yuan group as a result, and also it could not fundamentally change Goryeo-Mongol relationship. However, these arguments mostly lack of validity in terms of applying the standard of "anti-Yuan". This is because either removing anti-Yuan party completely or bringing a fundamental change in the relationship was impossible. Moreover, among those rebuttals, some did not even fully understand the original explanation or supported themselves with materials which were not proven from historical fact.
In this paper I analyze the letter which sent to Yuan in October 1356 to reveal that Goryeo"s anti-Yuan policy was not for restoring Sejoguje but instead for breaking it and building a new relationship as a form of appointment-tribute. Meanwhile Goryeo sustained appointment-tribute relationship with Yuan, and I evaluated it as the best and the most feasible anti-Yuan policy for Goryeo to choose at that time.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001243579