메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(서울대)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第130輯
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    Along with the recent rise of China, debating the recycling of the traditional Chinese world order on seeking a new order in East Asia has arisen, which requires the historical approach that divides the tradition and its modern variation. Originally, the independence of domestic affairs and diplomacy of a tributary state was assured in the Chinese world order.
    In the 1880s, however, the Qing Empire attempted to make a tributary state Choson Korea as a subordinate state in terms of the international law, which ended in failure. On the extension of such an imperialistic policy, the Republican Chinese textbook and historical geography regarded all tributary states in East Asia as recently lost Chinese territory. Such a territorial imagination was standardized by Sun Wen (孫文) and succeeded to Chiang Kai-shek(蔣介石) and Mao Zedong(毛澤東), and reflected in the plan for the East Asian order of the Republic of China.
    Although such an expansionistic territorial imagination was controlled applicably by the People"s Republic of China, the sign of its gradual comeback is seen riding on the atmosphere which emphasizes the Sun Wen legacy after the 1980s. The discussion of the recycling of the Chinese world order emphasized without considering how to overcome the Chinese empireness, which regards a tributary state as territory, is hardly in use among the neighboring countries in East Asia.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-001344929