The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between self-management and psychological skills of tennis club members of sports for all. The research was conducted on valid sample of 363 tennis club members of domestic through Athletes` Self-Management Questionnaire(Hur Jung Hun, 2003) and Sports Psychological Skill Questionnaire(Yu Jin, Hur Jung Hun, 2002). For statistical treatment, SPSS 18.0 statistical program was used to conduct independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. The research suggested the following results. First, regarding the difference of self-management depending on sex, there were significant differences in mental management, and regarding psychological skills, there were significant differences in goal-setting, imagery, willpower, concentration, and anxiety control. As for the difference in self-management depending on age, the difference of self-management was found in training management, and the difference of psychological skills was found in goal-setting. Regarding the difference of self-management depending on career history, the difference of self-management was found in mental management, and the difference of psychological skills was found in anxiety control. Regarding the difference of self-management depending on level was found in interpersonal management, training management, mental management and body management and the difference of psychological skills was found in goal-setting, imagery, teamwork, willpower, concentration, and anxiety control. Second, the influence of self-management on goal-setting of psychological skills found that in the winners group, training management, and mental management had positive influence, and in the non-winners group, training management, mental management, and body management had positive influence. As for the influence on imagery, mental management and training management in the winners group, and interpersonal management, training management, and mental management in the non-winners group had positive influence. With regard to the influence on teamwork, regardless of level, interpersonal relationship management had positive influence. Regarding the influence on willpower, training management in the winners group, and training management, mental management, and interpersonal management in the non-winners group had positive influence. As for the influence on the concentration, training management and mental management had positive influence in the winners group, and mental management had positive influence in the non-winners group, interpersonal management had negative influence in the non-winners group. Regarding the influence on the anxiety control, training management had positive influence in the winners group and the result in the non-winners group was F=2.166, p>.05, indicating that themodel was not statistically significant. The results suggest taht programs and instruction methods appropr-iate for each person of the tennis group need to be developed. and best performance of play is possible whenpsychological skills is enhanced through strict self-management.