지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to Karl Barth, God can not be grasped by epistemological categories of human beings, because God is the wholly Other. God is done by the sola gratia. For Barth, natural theology which is possible by the analogia entis is impossible because of the radical corruption of human beings. What we need is the analogia fidei in order to acquire a knowledge of God. However, Emil Brunner`s understanding of revelation is different from Barth`s. Brunner admits a fundamental significance of general revelation in his dialectics. It becomes a presupposition of special revelation in the formal aspect of Imago Dei which signifies universal characteristics of human beings which separate them from other creatures. But, Brunner`s acceptance of general revelation is passive. Like Barth, he also admits only the sola gratia. In Barth`s view, Brunner`s thinking is in danger of falling into natural theology, because the formal image slips into the material. We can hold the Reformed principle of the sola gratia admitting an epistemological effect of general revelation, insofar as revelation is grasped within the Trinitarian point of view. The Trinitarian point of view should be accepted in all spheres of theology.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0