인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
In the case of Korea, most studies on Yanagi Muneyoshi have been centered on his folkcrafts theory from the perspective of Joseon art. They interpret his theory mostly by linking it to the political ideas under colonial rule. Approaching the theory with the colonial view of history or with Orientalism, however, should not be regarded as a single step forward from the criticism, which swept the 1970s, of “the beauty of sadness” or “environmentalism” of Muneyoshi. Some studies view his Joseon Art Theory on a positive note, but in most cases, they are trapped in the boundary of Joseon art and fail to make a more in-depth discussion from a different point of view.
In contrast, active discussions have been made in Japan over Folkcrafts Theory by Yanagi Muneyoshi as a thought of craft that challenged the western view of art introduced into Japan in the early modern era. They try to identify the generally-accepted thought of art or concept of craft in his times, and compare the outcomes with his thought of art for analysis. Through his folkcrafts theory, they noticeably end up diagnosing the modern world of art.
Building a correct view of history itself is important. However, in order to better understand the concept of craft in his times, Korean scholars should adopt more various factors. By considering, for example, then the western view, the thoughts of art in the modern era of Japan, and how the concept of Korean art and craft was established in the corresponding period, a more objective critique on the thought and practice of Yanagi Muneyoshi can be drawn. Only in this way, his folkcrafts theory will be recognized as a new form of challenge requiring more vibrant and critical discussions.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지In contrast, active discussions have been made in Japan over Folkcrafts Theory by Yanagi Muneyoshi as a thought of craft that challenged the western view of art introduced into Japan in the early modern era. They try to identify the generally-accepted thought of art or concept of craft in his times, and compare the outcomes with his thought of art for analysis. Through his folkcrafts theory, they noticeably end up diagnosing the modern world of art.
Building a correct view of history itself is important. However, in order to better understand the concept of craft in his times, Korean scholars should adopt more various factors. By considering, for example, then the western view, the thoughts of art in the modern era of Japan, and how the concept of Korean art and craft was established in the corresponding period, a more objective critique on the thought and practice of Yanagi Muneyoshi can be drawn. Only in this way, his folkcrafts theory will be recognized as a new form of challenge requiring more vibrant and critical discussions.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Abstract
- 1. 서론
- 2. 국내 야나기 연구의 특징적 양상
- 3. 야나기의 이론과 실천에 관한 일본의 연구 양상
- 4. 민예에 대한 시각과 민예론의 영향에서 한 · 일 간 비교
- 5. 결론 : 민예연구의 위치와 의미재고
- 참고문헌
- REFERENCES
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-001609828
