메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(한남대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제13권 제2호 (통권 제28호)
발행연도
수록면
183 - 197 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

Banks’ inconsistent behavior to charge the interest rate spread in the floating-rate residential mortgages is ceaselessly controversial. Based upon 23,147 Seoul housing loans of a commercial bank originated from January 2009 to May 2013, the purpose of this study is to 1) estimate the credit score with 10 credit risk factors; 2) test the risk premium over the ten factors with base rate and liquidity; and then 3) examine the logical consistency of ‘higher risk, higher spread.’ Two dependants are loan rating score and interest rate spread. Risk factors include three numerical variables (LTV (loan-to-value) ratio, DTI (debt-to-income) ratio and borrower age) with seven dummies, i.e. newcomer borrower, senior debt, senior rent deposit, Kangnam area, condominium type, other liability (than mortgage) and gender. Three month CD (Certificate of Deposit) rate is quoted as base rate and each loan’s liquidity premium is calculated by its maturity and interest rate reset frequency.
Spread seems to increase by higher liquidity premium as well as lower base rate and credit score, and vice-versa. Senior legal rights to mortgage claim, location in Kangnam, condominium type residence, other debt service and gender are strongly correlated with the mechanism of ‘higher risk, higher spread.’ In contrast, not only newcomers without credit history but higher LTV and DTI ratios look to lower the interest spread though they are significantly hurting the credit grades.
Our results imply that the unequitable pricing of mortgages does not attribute to rating system but lending practices, such as cross bargain of insurance, credit card, etc. Also, we confirm the earlier studies’ findings that Korean banks raise the spreads in times of lower base rates.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Abstract
  2. Ⅰ. 서론
  3. Ⅱ. 선행연구의 고찰
  4. Ⅲ. 이론적 틀과 방법론
  5. Ⅳ. 실증분석의 결과
  6. Ⅴ. 결론 및 함의
  7. 참고문헌

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-595-001617600