지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are obvious differences between the educational system of landscape architecture and architecture as well as similarities. The most apparent dissimilarity is that design education is not always the core of landscape architecture curriculum, depending on a direction of universities. Therefore, it is hard to deny that there are more limitations to design professors in the landscape architecture field compared to architecture.
The greatest advantage to be a member of academia as a designer is to have an opportunity to develop different design approach to the project which could not be easily tested in private design companies. To me, the different design approach means the design strongly integrated with theoretical aspects. Although it is not necessary for many designers to change their design style in case of getting an offer from universities, I have three specific reasons to seek change in my design.
First, I have not fully developed a specific design style of method. It was natural to abandon my previous design approach which was quite bounded to the style of previous office I worked for. Second, it was my thought that there should be different values in design practice as a professor than a designer severing for private firm. Not considering such aspects, there is a great risk to regard a teaching position as a mere opportunity for marketing for business. Third, I have had a specific interest in integrating theory and practice for a long time. Ironically, in the recent design trend pretending not to be too serious and to be cool, I found it could be a rather unique design approach to be strategically serious in theoretical rationale that lies behind design practices.
Even though I could only tell that I am still experimenting how to integrate theory and design practice, the direction of my approach is quite clear. While all individual projects of design are fundamentally singular, the essential characteristic of theory is genericity. To pursue practice based on theory and theory supported by practice is not much different from considering genericity based on singularity in both theory and design practice.
Perhaps the crucial meaning of doing practice in academia is wasting time and being over-thoughtful, almost pedantic, since these futile experiments and efforts might be a footing to nurture diversities in the field while providing opportunities to search unrealized potentials for the future generation of design.
The greatest advantage to be a member of academia as a designer is to have an opportunity to develop different design approach to the project which could not be easily tested in private design companies. To me, the different design approach means the design strongly integrated with theoretical aspects. Although it is not necessary for many designers to change their design style in case of getting an offer from universities, I have three specific reasons to seek change in my design.
First, I have not fully developed a specific design style of method. It was natural to abandon my previous design approach which was quite bounded to the style of previous office I worked for. Second, it was my thought that there should be different values in design practice as a professor than a designer severing for private firm. Not considering such aspects, there is a great risk to regard a teaching position as a mere opportunity for marketing for business. Third, I have had a specific interest in integrating theory and practice for a long time. Ironically, in the recent design trend pretending not to be too serious and to be cool, I found it could be a rather unique design approach to be strategically serious in theoretical rationale that lies behind design practices.
Even though I could only tell that I am still experimenting how to integrate theory and design practice, the direction of my approach is quite clear. While all individual projects of design are fundamentally singular, the essential characteristic of theory is genericity. To pursue practice based on theory and theory supported by practice is not much different from considering genericity based on singularity in both theory and design practice.
Perhaps the crucial meaning of doing practice in academia is wasting time and being over-thoughtful, almost pedantic, since these futile experiments and efforts might be a footing to nurture diversities in the field while providing opportunities to search unrealized potentials for the future generation of design.
목차
영역적 차이와 설계의 경계
이론과 실천의 사이
새로운 설계를 위한 변명
그렇다면?
학교에서 실무를 한다는 것의 의미
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Design Thinking
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .11
-
Evaluation of current practice and associated challenges towards integrated design
Advances in computational design
2017 .01
-
PSD법을 이용한 유니버설 디자인에 관한 연구
산업경영시스템학회지
2015 .01
-
파라메트릭 디자인에 대한 이해와 적용
건축
2015 .06
-
사회혁신 프로젝트 수행을 위한 디자인 씽킹과 비즈니스 모델 젠 연계 방법론
디지털산업정보학회논문지
2017 .01
-
온라인 거래가 가능한 가상화폐를 위한 핀테크 보안에 관한 연구
대한전자공학회 학술대회
2020 .11
-
느슨한 연결고리의 잠재성
건축
2015 .07
-
참조 모델과 설계 이력 데이터를 이용한 자동차 기구 요소의 지식 기반 설계 시스템 개발
대한설비관리학회지
2020 .01
-
지식기반설계 시스템을 이용한 광학 구조물의 초기 설계 알고리즘 개발
한국기계기술학회지
2018 .01
-
VR을 활용한 건축 통합설계프로세스에 대한 연구 - 기본설계프로세스, BIM통합설계프로세스와의 차이를 중심으로 -
대한건축학회논문집
2023 .07
-
결측치가 있는 실험계획 데이터의 분석 방법에 관한 소고
대한산업공학회지
2021 .06
-
건축설계 실무과정에서 디자인 프로세스의 적용에 관한 연구
한국농촌건축학회논문집
2022 .08
-
알고리즘을 통한 자유곡면 쉘 구조물의 설계 및 시공
건축
2015 .06
-
설계오류 자동검증을 위한 안전설계 Rule Library 기반 구축에 관한 연구
한국위험물학회지
2022 .12
-
Evaluation of Structural Design Enhancement and Sensitivity of Automatic Ocean Salt Collector According to Design of Experiments
한국해양공학회지
2020 .08
-
Approaches to Heuristic & Quantitative Analysis of Power Plant Equipment & Structure Layout Design based on Virtual Reality
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .11
-
도시 구조 단계의 관점에서 바라본 건축디자인 사례연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2023 .04
-
Participatory Design Process for Children’s Play Area - A case study of Ungok Primary School Gimcheon Korea
한국생태환경건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2020 .12
-
Generative Design Workflow for Modular Architecture: Matrix-based Algorithm
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2021 .04
-
Precedent based design foundations for parametric design: The case of navigation and wayfinding
Advances in computational design
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
김수근 종교건축 3제에서 나타나는 공간의 경계와 구분에 관한 연구
한지애
,
박연정
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2014
.03
건축 내ㆍ외부공간 경계의 모호성에 관한 연구
곽기표
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2005
.04
경계, 근대적 공간, 그리고 그 너머 : 로컬리티 연구에서 로컬리티-기반의 이해와 관련하여
배윤기
인문과학연구
2012
.09
시지각적 접근에 의한 Müller House의 경계구조 연구
이성운
,
김경연
,
곽경숙
외 1명
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2011
.10
르 꼬르뷔제의 공간 형성 체계로서의 경계 구조 특성에 관한 연구
김재철
,
김경연
,
곽경숙
외 1명
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2011
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-540-001796530