인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This paper analyzes the legal issues relating to the withdrawal of the exercise of voting rights in the resolution of the general shareholders" meeting. The question is whether a revocation of the vote even after receipt by the company is still possible.
Controversy may be provoked as to whether the general principles relating to the withdrawal of intention can be applied to the exercise of voting rights. Some scholars deny its application. As for the exercise of voting rights by electronic means, Commercial Code Decree Article 13(3) prohibits the withdrawal and changes of the exercise of voting rights. However, basically from the perspective of fundamental principles as freedom of withdrawal even in voting rights, this paper presents the view that the general principles relating to the withdrawal of intention may be applicable to the exercise of voting rights in the following reasons:
(ⅰ) Pursuant to Civil Code Article 111(1), the declaration of intention made to another party can be withdrawn before reaching the other side. Applying this principle to the withdrawal of the exercise of voting rights, persons who exercise the voting rights may withdraw it prior to the final resolution, even though after the voting has arrived at the company;
(ⅱ) Above conclusion does not hurt the stability of the resolution of the general shareholders" meeting, if the time of withdrawal is prior to resolutions.
Finally, this paper also presents the opinion that it is also possible to repose restrictions on the exercise of voting rights by the Articles of Incorporation.
Controversy may be provoked as to whether the general principles relating to the withdrawal of intention can be applied to the exercise of voting rights. Some scholars deny its application. As for the exercise of voting rights by electronic means, Commercial Code Decree Article 13(3) prohibits the withdrawal and changes of the exercise of voting rights. However, basically from the perspective of fundamental principles as freedom of withdrawal even in voting rights, this paper presents the view that the general principles relating to the withdrawal of intention may be applicable to the exercise of voting rights in the following reasons:
(ⅰ) Pursuant to Civil Code Article 111(1), the declaration of intention made to another party can be withdrawn before reaching the other side. Applying this principle to the withdrawal of the exercise of voting rights, persons who exercise the voting rights may withdraw it prior to the final resolution, even though after the voting has arrived at the company;
(ⅱ) Above conclusion does not hurt the stability of the resolution of the general shareholders" meeting, if the time of withdrawal is prior to resolutions.
Finally, this paper also presents the opinion that it is also possible to repose restrictions on the exercise of voting rights by the Articles of Incorporation.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-001851514