지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Makbu institution(幕府制) was shared by many countries in East Asia, as Chinese dynasties’ title of a General[將軍] became universal, and generated the authority to open a Bu unit[開府權]. Yet each country in East Asia embraced it in different manners. In this article, a closer look into this Chinese institution is attempted in order to enhance our own understanding of Makbu’s functions and roles. The difference between the concept of a Jang-gun and the ‘title’ of a Jang-gun, as well as the meaning and function of both Jang-gun and its adjutant in Baekje, are examined in particular. Meanwhile, also analyzed is the meaning behind the connection between Jang-gun titles and the royalty(kings), which would shed some light upon the concept and political meaning of King’s Makbu.
In Chinese dynasties, Jang-gun initially was a mere temporary title. Later, Jang-gun as an official seat for a military officer, and the ‘Jang-gun’ title which was an indicator of one’s status, started to diverge from each other. The latter was essentially a reflection of one’s social status and political rank[官階], but it also retained the meaning of justifying one’s possession of a private army. The custom of having such title was shared by many adjacent countries.
The Baekje king received a high-ranking Jang-gun title from Chinese dynasties, and seems to have been authorized to establish his own Bu units[開府權]. Scholars believe that, based upon such authority, the kings would have also named officials to be posted at such Bu units, but at the same time the unit itself would have been run in a Baekje-specific manner. The Jang-gun title of Baekje, as in many other foreign examples, was also a rank and status indicator. It was a system that was regulated by the king and king alone, and worked as a supplementary system for the existing ranking system[官等]. The Baekje adjutants were usually named among Chinese people who came to Baekje as part of the Chinese delegation, whose function was first and foremost diplomatic.
In Baekje, the Jang-gun title combined with the royalty system(Wang · Hu System) provided the kings with an authority and military power to subdue resistance against the government’s official taxation. It was another way of controlling the local factions. Low ranking Jang-gun titles were offered to local factions so that they could agree to honor the central’s authority. Chinese adjutants named inside Baekje served as cronies of the king with little to offer on their own. They were made part of the Kings’ Makbu, but later, since the reign of king Dongseong-wang, 12 offices of Naedu(內頭) and Naegwan(內官) replaced them. The adjutant system was run differently from its Chinese counterpart, and shows us the unique nature of Baekje institutions.
In Chinese dynasties, Jang-gun initially was a mere temporary title. Later, Jang-gun as an official seat for a military officer, and the ‘Jang-gun’ title which was an indicator of one’s status, started to diverge from each other. The latter was essentially a reflection of one’s social status and political rank[官階], but it also retained the meaning of justifying one’s possession of a private army. The custom of having such title was shared by many adjacent countries.
The Baekje king received a high-ranking Jang-gun title from Chinese dynasties, and seems to have been authorized to establish his own Bu units[開府權]. Scholars believe that, based upon such authority, the kings would have also named officials to be posted at such Bu units, but at the same time the unit itself would have been run in a Baekje-specific manner. The Jang-gun title of Baekje, as in many other foreign examples, was also a rank and status indicator. It was a system that was regulated by the king and king alone, and worked as a supplementary system for the existing ranking system[官等]. The Baekje adjutants were usually named among Chinese people who came to Baekje as part of the Chinese delegation, whose function was first and foremost diplomatic.
In Baekje, the Jang-gun title combined with the royalty system(Wang · Hu System) provided the kings with an authority and military power to subdue resistance against the government’s official taxation. It was another way of controlling the local factions. Low ranking Jang-gun titles were offered to local factions so that they could agree to honor the central’s authority. Chinese adjutants named inside Baekje served as cronies of the king with little to offer on their own. They were made part of the Kings’ Makbu, but later, since the reign of king Dongseong-wang, 12 offices of Naedu(內頭) and Naegwan(內官) replaced them. The adjutant system was run differently from its Chinese counterpart, and shows us the unique nature of Baekje institutions.
목차
머리말
1. 중국왕조에서 장군의 변천과 장군호
2. 백제에서의 막부제 수용 양상
3. 백제의 군사제도와 막부제
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
5세기 동아시아에서의 책봉호의 정치적 의미 : 백제 및 남조 주변제국에 수여된 장군호를 중심으로
역사와 세계
2017 .12
-
5세기 百濟 官制에 미친 中國 將軍制의 영향
백제학보
2024 .08
-
漢城期 백제의 將軍號 활용 배경과 정치적 의미
백제문화
2015 .02
-
15세기 粉靑沙器장군의 용도와 특징
한국학연구
2016 .06
-
중국왕조의 ‘百濟略有遼西’ 記事 서술과 인식- 百濟郡 설치를 중심으로 -
백제학보
2018 .01
-
6세기 동아시아에서의 책봉호의 정치적 의미 — 국제정세의 변동과 백제의 책봉호에 반영된 인식을 중심으로 —
사림
2018 .01
-
4~6세기 백제에서의 중국계 이주민의 정착과 활동
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
후백제 주도 세력의 변화와 그 영향
신라사학보
2021 .04
-
중국학계의 백제사 연구 현황과 전망
동북아역사논총
2022 .09
-
6~7세기 신라 장군(將軍)의 역할과 운용
역사와현실
2015 .09
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
웅진기 백제와 왜국의 교류
한국고대사연구
2024 .09
-
百濟의 王·侯號에 대한 역사적 경험과 그 활용 배경
한국고대사연구
2021 .12
-
백제의 한자 수용과 문서 행정 시기
호서고고학
2024 .06
-
4세기 말~5세기 초엽 ‘백제왕(百濟王)’호의 책봉 배경과 ‘도독백제제군사(都督百濟諸軍事)’호의 의의
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
한국사에서의 漢四郡 認識
고조선단군학
2022 .04
-
<日本書紀> 百濟 관련 기사의 역사적 가치에 대한 검토
전북사학
2015 .01
-
매체적 관점에서의 한국근대시 시제(詩題) 연구 -개화기시가에서 근대 자유시 이전까지-
한국언어문학
2015 .01
-
642년 백제의 정변과 대왜관계에 대한 재검토
사림
2022 .01
-
포스터를 통해 바라본 백제문화제 -최근 10여 년을 중심으로-
人文科學硏究
2023 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001981616