메뉴 건너뛰기

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(Pusan National University)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第50卷 第6號
발행연도
수록면
21 - 32 (12page)
DOI
10.17208/jkpa.2015.10.50.6.21

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

Theoretical Paradigm in planning education is the rational planning model. This model see planning as a rational or scientific effort in which the planner’s appropriate role is to be a value-neutral technician. But, there has been increasing criticism about the rational planning model on the ground that the model is not appropriate to the description of planning practice. This study re-examined the widely accepted notion that planning as a rational or scientific effort in which the planner’s appropriate role is to be a value-neutral technician. This study twenty likert-type questions which uses the technical, political aspects of role made and used a sample of 177members of professional planners and 176members of students, to look at role perceptions of planners. On the results of analysis, the rational planning model has a limit as a planning paradigm which cannot explain modern planning practice appropriately on the ground that this model contains only technical aspects of planning, not political aspects. Planning education should put more effort for integrating political and technical role of planners and we need new planning paradigm to explain this well.
#합리적 계획모형 #계획가의 역할 #기술적 전문가 #정치적 전문가 #역할 인식 #Rational Planning Model #Role of the Planner #Technician #Politician #Role Perceptions
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Abstract
  2. Ⅰ. 서론
  3. Ⅱ. 계획가의 역할에 관한 선행연구
  4. Ⅲ. 계획가의 역할인식 조사설계
  5. Ⅳ. 계획가의 역할 인식결과
  6. Ⅴ. 결론
  7. 인용문헌 References

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
260319_딥리서치
260319_AI리더
260304_새학기에이전트
260428 이주의질문
260122_AIagent
260304_아그논문롤
260127_아그논문
260127_AI뷰어
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-539-002061931