메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이소영 (중앙대학교) 김지우 (중앙대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第31卷 第11號
발행연도
2015.11
수록면
93 - 101 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since aging is associated with physical, cognitive, and social limitations that affect functional capacity of individual, alternative housing options were sought by many researchers as well as housing industry. Barrier Free housing features can help older adults to cope with consequences of aging and to live more independently in their housing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preference of young adults and the elderly for accessible housing attributes in their housing choice by using conjoint method, whereby respondents ranked a specific combination of particular accessible features. Based on literature reviews, accessible attributes were identified and used for analysis. The accessible attributes are clear width, removal of level difference, vertical accessibility, grab bars, non-slippery floor materials, alarm device, controller for service, and cost. The result indicated how important each accessible attribute is according to individual differences including age, income, housing type, and ownership. The most apparent difference in preference between the younger and the elderly was cost aspects in associated with accessible features. Regardless of age, income, and housing type, the respondents rated cost more important in their housing choice decision compared to the other accessible features. The conjoint analysis revealed that accessible housing attributes were related to the socio-economic variables of residents and housing type. For a single house type, vertical accessibility (e.g. elevator installation) is important. The combination of accessible attributes of housing ranked by residents was suggested.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 문헌고찰
3. 분석 내용
4. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-540-002194712