메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제15집 제4호
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
143 - 171 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After world war Ⅱ, the accumulation of capital and the distribution of income become the central issue. The private property system was restricted within public welfare or social necessity. So several nations` answer to monopoly-controlled industries introduced legislation to nationalize the basic industries. About the year 1980, privatization is the trend of economic policies towards economic renewal. but, in essence nationalization is still the procedure used today, the privatization plan has already faced opposition from the people. I focused that the disutility, lax management or stifled innovation etc., is up in the air on the essence of privatization. These are applicable to not privatization but innovation of public sector. The essence of privatization is on the monopoly-controlled function and social effect realized to each characters. On the other, regulation system is an answer to monopoly-controlled industries. It is enough to use for avoidance of social stress or cost to nationalize the basic industries. But regulation system is deeply trouble by the rapidly evolving internationalization and online economies of scale. So in this current society, practically speaking, we can`t nationalize the monopoly-controlled industries. So It is important to attempt privatization carefully.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002579426