메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제16집 제2호
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
7 - 52 (46page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Over a month has passed since the sinking of the SEWOL passenger ship, yet day by day the media is putting forward new analysis for cause of the tragedy. The violation of duty by the crew, inadequate initial response, the absence of a disaster management control tower, the suspicion of preferential treatment of certain private rescue service enterprises, poor standards of vessel inspections, non-compliance of ship operation regulations are just a few of the endless problems that have surfaced as the problem behind the SEWOL disaster. It can be said that through the SEWOL disaster, the present state of the ROK`s crisis management ability has clearly been exposed. At this point, it is crucial to examine disaster management law regarding maritime disasters caused by passenger vessels to prevent a repeat of an incident like the SEWOL disaster. On the other hand, it also holds importance as it calls for interest towards the otherwise neglected disaster management act. Generally, the disaster management system is categorized into the areas of prevention, preparation, response and recovery. When each stage of the disaster management system comes together organizationally and co-operatively, the objectives of disaster management can be reached. Following such divisions, the most crucial stage of disaster management is prevention. In the event of a disaster, there must be thorough preparation to respond in order to effectively protect the lives of the citizens. However, as preparation and response is commonly considered to be related to organization and activities, it is has aspects that prove to be difficult in applying the principles that are traditionally studied in the area of administrative law. For such reasons, the research undertaken in by the field of law has been focused on the safety system of police law`s risk prevention in the area of prevention. Thus, awareness of the neglect of research in disaster management act on the overall is necessary. In addition, there was a greater weakness in the study of maritime disaster management in comparison to general disaster management. The reason such can be related back to the nature of maritime disasters to be more closely linked to a number of international conventions of varying legal natures rather than domestic law. With this background, this paper analyzes the legal system and study of maritime disaster management system and presents the current legal systems problems and also gives a proposal for its improvement. The laws related to maritime disasters caused by passage vessels are 「Framework Act on The Management of Disasters And Safety」, 「Ship Safety Act」, 「Maritime Safety Act」, 「Rescue and Aid at Sea and in the River Act」, 「Seafarers Act」, and 「Marine Transport Act」. The various systems that are regulating these laws were divided by disaster management stages and analyzed to deduce the problems. In addition, this paper clarifies that disaster management is a duty of the nation state, and researches whether the duty of disaster management can be carried out with cooperatively with private organizations, and if so to what extent is private cooperation suitable.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)

  • 대법원 2011. 4. 21.자 2010무111 전원합의체 결정

    [1] 항고소송 대상이 되는 행정청의 처분이란 원칙적으로 행정청의 공법상 행위로서 특정사항에 대하여 법규에 의한 권리의 설정 또는 의무의 부담을 명하거나 기타 법률상 효과를 직접 발생하게 하는 등 국민의 권리의무에 직접 관계가 있는 행위를 말하므로, 행정청의 내부적인 의사결정 등과 같이 상대방 또는 관계자들의 법률상 지위에 직접 법률적 변동

    자세히 보기
  • 대법원 1998. 8. 21. 선고 97다13702 판결

    [1] 민법 제756조 소정의 사용자와 피용자의 관계는 반드시 유효한 고용관계가 있는 경우에 한하는 것이 아니고, 사실상 어떤 사람이 다른 사람을 위하여 그 지휘·감독 아래 그 의사에 따라 사무를 집행하는 관계에 있으면 족한 것이며, 타인에게 위탁하여 계속적으로 사무를 처리하여 온 경우 객관적으로 보아 그 타인의 행위가 위탁자의 지휘·감

    자세히 보기

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002571940