개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.2
- 수록면
- 1 - 92 (92page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean government has introduced the “law of Livestock industry integration” in 2013. The main purpose of this study is to assess a law-abidingness of poultry industry after the legislation. This study also pursues drawing a task for a successful livestock industry integration policy. To achieve the purpose, this study summarizes a concept and history of a livestock industry integration in Korea. The keystone of the “law of Livestock industry integration” and related regulations are reviewed in the study.
This study shows that top 10 poultry packers’ slaughtering volume occupied 70.4 percent of total domestic poultry slaughtering in 2014. This study estimated the Korean poultry market concentration rate, and its annual growth rate is less than 2 percent during last 10 years. The estimated CR3, CR5, and CR8 are 36%, 50.5%, and 64.7% each. In addition, estimated HHI shows that the annual growth rate of the Korean poultry market is less than 3 percent. All those outcomes confirm that the Korean poultry market is not a perfectly oligopoly market. The becoming of oligopoly market is currently underway but the competition between high-ranked packers is getting deepened.
After introducing the livestock industry integration policy, the poultry productivity index increased from 203.5 in 2000 to 294 in 2013. Especially contracted farms show highly increased outcome compared to non-contracted farms. Farmers replied to the survey that the “law of Livestock industry integration” positively affects several rearing contract related issues.
The survey result from 94 poultry farms shows that farms’ annual number of breeding is about 5 times and average commission is about 23,600 thousand won for a time. The main reasons of farmers’ changing contractor are replied as “quality of chick”, “the amounts of commission”, and “commission evaluation system.” These replies mean farmers still feel disadvantage by packers after introducing the “law of Livestock industry integration” in 2013.
This study realizes the main task for improving livestock industry integration policy is forming the mutual trust between farmers and packers in rearing contract. To meet this end, several policy improvements are necessary such as “prompt introducing and adopting use of standard form contract”, “forming and strengthening the farmer-council toward contractors or packers”, and “monitoring illegal activities of packers.” The U.S. “Packers and Stockyards Program” is also a good example to improve relationship between farms and packers towards better partnership. Introducing a better standard, such as productivity measure or efficiency measure, to analyze a performance of the related policy is another key to achieve better industry structure.
This study shows that top 10 poultry packers’ slaughtering volume occupied 70.4 percent of total domestic poultry slaughtering in 2014. This study estimated the Korean poultry market concentration rate, and its annual growth rate is less than 2 percent during last 10 years. The estimated CR3, CR5, and CR8 are 36%, 50.5%, and 64.7% each. In addition, estimated HHI shows that the annual growth rate of the Korean poultry market is less than 3 percent. All those outcomes confirm that the Korean poultry market is not a perfectly oligopoly market. The becoming of oligopoly market is currently underway but the competition between high-ranked packers is getting deepened.
After introducing the livestock industry integration policy, the poultry productivity index increased from 203.5 in 2000 to 294 in 2013. Especially contracted farms show highly increased outcome compared to non-contracted farms. Farmers replied to the survey that the “law of Livestock industry integration” positively affects several rearing contract related issues.
The survey result from 94 poultry farms shows that farms’ annual number of breeding is about 5 times and average commission is about 23,600 thousand won for a time. The main reasons of farmers’ changing contractor are replied as “quality of chick”, “the amounts of commission”, and “commission evaluation system.” These replies mean farmers still feel disadvantage by packers after introducing the “law of Livestock industry integration” in 2013.
This study realizes the main task for improving livestock industry integration policy is forming the mutual trust between farmers and packers in rearing contract. To meet this end, several policy improvements are necessary such as “prompt introducing and adopting use of standard form contract”, “forming and strengthening the farmer-council toward contractors or packers”, and “monitoring illegal activities of packers.” The U.S. “Packers and Stockyards Program” is also a good example to improve relationship between farms and packers towards better partnership. Introducing a better standard, such as productivity measure or efficiency measure, to analyze a performance of the related policy is another key to achieve better industry structure.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표 차례
그림 차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구 필요성과 목적
2. 선행연구 검토
3. 연구 내용과 방법
[제2장 육계산업 현황과 구조]
1. 육계산업 현황
2. 육계산업 구조
[제3장 육계계열화사업 도입과 현황]
1. 육계계열화사업 도입 과정
2. 육계계열화사업 현황
[제4장 계열화사업 문제점과 성과]
1. 계열화사업 문제점
2. 계열화사업 성과
3. 계열화사업 관련 법률 제정 효과
[제5장 계열화사업 발전 과제]
1. 발전을 위한 기본 과제
2. 발전 방안 검토
[부록]
[참고 문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
축산업의 사회적 책임 이행 실태와 정책과제 (1/2차년도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2019 .02
-
동물복지 산란계 농장의 사육 형태별 경제성 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2022 .06
-
손실지출변경을 활용한 가축방역 사업의 재정효율성 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2020 .01
-
경기도 축사시설의 악취 개선방안 연구
정책연구
2016 .10
-
정보화기기 활용이 국내 축산농가 총판매금액에 미치는 영향 분석
농촌계획
2024 .02
-
한국 산업축산의 발전과정 : 구조적 생태문제의 세계사적 연원
환경사회학연구 ECO
2018 .12
-
축사시설현대화사업의 효과분석
식품유통연구
2017 .01
-
축산업 환경영향 분석과 정책과제
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2021 .10
-
한우에 대한 축산물등급판정제도의 경제 효과 분석
식품유통연구
2017 .01
-
말산업 분야에 대한 축산발전기금 활용 확대 방안 논의 : 축산법 및 한국마사회법 개정을 중심으로
농업경영.정책연구
2019 .01
-
고령화시대 청년 창업농업인 육성체계 개선방안
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2017 .10
-
축협사업과 축산농가소득의 연관성 분석
협동조합경영연구
2021 .01
-
소비자의 대체축산식품 가치 인식과 구입 의향의 결정요인
식품유통연구
2024 .06
-
디지털 트랜스포메이션 시대의 6차산업 소비자의 특성과 만족도 분석
서비스경영학회지
2021 .09
-
An Analysis on the Impact of KOCIA Project on Smallholder Village Poultry Farmer: A case of Bangladesh
농업경영.정책연구
2020 .01
-
가축분뇨처리지원사업의 가축분뇨 자원화 효과 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2019 .01
-
친환경안전축산물직불제 사업의 성과 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2020 .01
-
The Effect Analysis of KOICA Project in Bangladesh: A Case of Poultry Raising Technology
국제개발협력연구
2021 .12
-
계란 등급판정제도에 대한 경제적 효과 분석 연구
농업경영.정책연구
2021 .09
-
대규모 집약형 축산으로 인한 복합적·누적적 리스크와 법적대응 방안
환경법과 정책
2021 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
(주)하림의 수직적 계열화를 통한 경쟁우위 확보전략
박성태
,
유병남
Korea Business Review
1998
.06
축산계열화의 평가와 발전 방안
정민국
,
이명기
,
김현중
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2010
.10
축산물 시장의 가격전달채널 분석 및 가격안정화 방안 : 육계 및 계란시장을 중심으로
박문수
,
황선웅
,
서상택
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2012
.12
낙농자조금의 수급조절 효과 및 오리산업의 계열화 효과 분석
정찬진
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2013
.12
肉鷄 統合體系(系列化) 展開 過程上의 似而非 系列主體 問題
김정주
,
박영인
한국가금학회지
1993
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-522-002206780