메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(서강대학교)
저널정보
서강대학교 법학연구소 법과기업연구 법과기업연구 제5권 제3호
오류 신고하기

피인용 1

검색

    초록·키워드

    It has been studied with many precedents up to now about the contents of the procedure and the condition of the lawful prosecution of the shareholder"s derivative action. On the other hand, in such action when winning the case judgment was taken out, it"ll be a problem about how to enforce. However, there were almost no precedents and study works up to now about the enforcement the stockholder who is a plaintiff does in the action.
    Supreme Court rendered a first adjudication on a problem like the above. I thought this will be an important precedent from now on, so it was taken up conversantly by this study. Supreme Court judged that the stockholder who raised the action had the qualification to which can apply for enforcement. The reason is because the stockholder receives the effect of the judgment.
    Having the qualification to which the stockholder who is a plaintiff in the action can apply for enforcement conclusively can"t be denied. It"s very proper that the adjudication made that clear. I"d like to expect that the contents of the enforcement procedure in detail will be made taking this adjudication as an opportunity from now on.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002433372