메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(서울대학교)
저널정보
한국어학회 한국어학 한국어학 제69권
오류 신고하기

피인용 13

검색

    초록·키워드

    This paper discusses several characteristics found in Korean insubordination. According to Evans (2007), ‘insubordination’ refers to the conventionalized main clauses use of what appears to be formally subordinate clauses. The objects of this study are the following 6 forms, ‘-deunji’ ‘-eosseumyeon’, ‘-gineun1’ ‘-gineun2’ ‘-gileul’ and ‘-neun/eul subakke’, which have not been classified as sentence-final forms. They have several grammatical phenomena in common. First, they are not always allowed to recover a main clause or main verb, in other words, very restricted main verbs can come after these constructions. This means that the range of meanings of the insubordination construction becomes quite narrow and specific, compared to when they are used as ordinary subordinate clauses. Second, their illocutionary force does not change depending on intonation, unlike what we call ‘banmal(반말)’, and the sentence types of these constructions may often be vague. Third, some of them still cannot take tense endings and they can refer to past events, without taking past tense.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-002398864