메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제26집
발행연도
2003.9
수록면
307 - 326 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper deals with the semantic incongruity between English and Korean verbs. It has been noted that every language has its own culture-specific meanings and represents a unique way of seeing and thinking about the world, which results in meaning variation across languages. For example, the English verbs used to gloss the Korean verbs such as `freeze, burn, boil` do not really correspond to their counterparts in meaning, hence they can be misleading. Classification of verbs in terms of the semantic features such as [static], [telic], [punctual] fails to capture such semantic difference between languages. Instead, based on the combinations of the semantic concepts such as action, goal, fulfillment, and implicature, this paper attempts to explicate the semantic difference between English and Korean verbs. This paper shows that English and Korean have different verb lexicalization patterns in the domain of fulfillment of events of realization. English verbs characteristically lexicalized to express the attained fulfillment. By contrast, Korean verbs are characteristically lexicalized to express implied fulfillment and require additional satellite forms such as confirmation satellite adverbs and serial verbs to enhance the confirmation of attained fulfillment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002557651