지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to investigate the shaping of knowledge and discourse on ginseng, especially among physicians and botanists, since its introduction to France from the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century until the early 18<SUP>th</SUP> century. In France, knowledge on herbal medicine, including that of ginseng, was shaped under the influence of the modern state’s policy and institution: mercantilism and the Académie royale des sciences. The knowledge of herbal medicine developed as an important part of the mercantilist policy supported systematically by the Académie.
The East Asian ginseng, renowned as a panacea, was first introduced into France in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century, initially in a roundabout way through transportation and English and Dutch publications of travel tales from various foreign countries. The publication activity was mainly conducted by Thévenot company with the intention to meet the needs of French mercantilism promoted by Colbert. It also implied interests on medicine in order to bolster the people’s health. The Thévenot company’s activity thus offered vital information on plants and herbs abroad, one of which was ginseng. Furthermore, with Louis XIV’s dispatching of the Jesuit missionaries to East Asia, the Frenchmen were able to directly gather information on ginseng. These information became a basis for research of the Académie.
In the Académie, founded in 1666 by Colbert, the king’s physicians and botanists systematically and collectively studied on exotic plants and medical herbs including ginseng. They were also key figures of the Jardin du Roi. These institutions bore a striking contrast to the faculty of medicine at the University of Paris which has been a center of the traditional Galenic medicine. The research of the Académie on ginseng was greatly advanced, owing much to the reports and samples sent from China and Canada by Jartoux, Sarrazin, and Lapitau.
From the early 18<SUP>th</SUP> century, the conservative attitude of the University of Paris, which was a stronghold of conservative Galenic Medicine, began to change with its new interest on foreign medicine herbs, including Chinese medicine. In our opinion, this change is exemplified in a paper, that is to say in a thése de licence or thése quolibétique in French, submitted to the Faculty of Medicine in 1736 by Folliot de Saint-Vast under the direction of Jacques-François Vendermonde. During this period, the knowledge of Chinese Materia Medica was introduced, despite of textual adaptation and interpolation, through the “translation” of Chinese medicale books such as Bencao Gangmu. The Chinese medical books were presented to the French academic public by doctors and Jesuit missionaries active in China. The assessment of the ginseng was generally favorable yet, although physicians and doctors began to take more caution on considering it as a panacea.
The East Asian ginseng, renowned as a panacea, was first introduced into France in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century, initially in a roundabout way through transportation and English and Dutch publications of travel tales from various foreign countries. The publication activity was mainly conducted by Thévenot company with the intention to meet the needs of French mercantilism promoted by Colbert. It also implied interests on medicine in order to bolster the people’s health. The Thévenot company’s activity thus offered vital information on plants and herbs abroad, one of which was ginseng. Furthermore, with Louis XIV’s dispatching of the Jesuit missionaries to East Asia, the Frenchmen were able to directly gather information on ginseng. These information became a basis for research of the Académie.
In the Académie, founded in 1666 by Colbert, the king’s physicians and botanists systematically and collectively studied on exotic plants and medical herbs including ginseng. They were also key figures of the Jardin du Roi. These institutions bore a striking contrast to the faculty of medicine at the University of Paris which has been a center of the traditional Galenic medicine. The research of the Académie on ginseng was greatly advanced, owing much to the reports and samples sent from China and Canada by Jartoux, Sarrazin, and Lapitau.
From the early 18<SUP>th</SUP> century, the conservative attitude of the University of Paris, which was a stronghold of conservative Galenic Medicine, began to change with its new interest on foreign medicine herbs, including Chinese medicine. In our opinion, this change is exemplified in a paper, that is to say in a thése de licence or thése quolibétique in French, submitted to the Faculty of Medicine in 1736 by Folliot de Saint-Vast under the direction of Jacques-François Vendermonde. During this period, the knowledge of Chinese Materia Medica was introduced, despite of textual adaptation and interpolation, through the “translation” of Chinese medicale books such as Bencao Gangmu. The Chinese medical books were presented to the French academic public by doctors and Jesuit missionaries active in China. The assessment of the ginseng was generally favorable yet, although physicians and doctors began to take more caution on considering it as a panacea.
목차
I. 머리말
2. 중상주의 정책과 인삼에 대한 관심의 부상
3. 프랑스 왕립과학원과 국왕의 정원
4. 파리 의과대학의 인삼 논문
5. 맺음말
참고문헌 REFERENCES
Abstract
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
Choisy, François-Timoléon de, Journal ou suite du voyage de Siam en forme de lettres familières fait en M. DC. LXXXV et M. DC. LXXXVI (Amsterdam: Pierre Mortier, 1687).
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptist, Regiae Scientiarum Academiae Historia (Paris: Étienne Michallet, 1698. Rev. ed. Paris: J.-B. Delespine, 1701).
Folliot de Saint-Vast, Lucas Augustinus et Jacobus Franciscus Vandermonde, Resp. Quæstio medica, An infirmis a morbo viribus reparandis Gin Seng? Præs. F. Vandermonde ([Parisiis]: typis Quillau, 1736).
Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bovier de, OEuvres complètes, tome VI, 1694-1727: Histoire de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris: Fayard, 1994).
Geoffroy, Claude-Josephe, “Moyen de préparer quelques racine à la manière des Orientaux,” Mémoire de l’Académie royale 9 (Juillet 1740), pp. 96-99.
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptist, Regiae Scientiarum Academiae Historia (Paris: Étienne Michallet, 1698. Rev. ed. Paris: J.-B. Delespine, 1701).
Folliot de Saint-Vast, Lucas Augustinus et Jacobus Franciscus Vandermonde, Resp. Quæstio medica, An infirmis a morbo viribus reparandis Gin Seng? Præs. F. Vandermonde ([Parisiis]: typis Quillau, 1736).
Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bovier de, OEuvres complètes, tome VI, 1694-1727: Histoire de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris: Fayard, 1994).
Geoffroy, Claude-Josephe, “Moyen de préparer quelques racine à la manière des Orientaux,” Mémoire de l’Académie royale 9 (Juillet 1740), pp. 96-99.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1715년 9월 1일, 루이 14세의 죽음 : ‘위대한 세기’의 종말과 새 시대의 개막
프랑스사 연구
2017 .08
-
한국고대의 본초 : 고조선 · 백제 · 신라를 중심으로
신라사학보
2015 .04
-
17-18세기 영미권의 인삼(Ginseng) 인식
의사학
2016 .08
-
Mercantilism, still a Useful Concept for Imperial History?
영국 연구
2018 .01
-
A survey on the naming mechanisms of Chinese herbal medicines: Based on the ECM+
언어과학연구
2024 .12
-
“Medicine of the Grassroots”: Korean Herbal Medicine Industry and Consumption during the Japanese Colonial Period
의사학
2020 .04
-
18세기 후반 프랑스에서의 픽처레스크 정원미학의 확산과 특성
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2021 .08
-
근대전환기 서구 근대 식물학의 도입과 확산의 토대 구축
한국민족운동사연구
2020 .01
-
서양의학에서의 인삼활용과 한계, 1660-1900 : 영국과 미국을 중심으로
의사학
2017 .12
-
Enlightenment Chemistry as an ‘Experimental Science’
한국과학사학회지
2018 .01
-
17~18세기 전반 인삼무역의 변동과 개성상인의 활동
탐라문화
2017 .06
-
From Woohwang Cheongsimwon (牛黃淸心元) to Ginseng (人蔘) : The History of Medicine Use in the Joseon Era
의사학
2017 .08
-
19세기 영국신문에 나타난 인삼(ginseng)
영국 연구
2015 .01
-
아편전쟁 이전 罌粟과 鴉片의 이해 ― 약재에서 금지품으로 ―
이화사학연구
2022 .06
-
“평등의 매력”과 모더니티 : 18세기 후반 파리 위락정원에 관한 연구
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2017 .05
-
루이 14세의 궁정 축제와 태양-왕 신화 만들기: 카루젤(1662)과 베르사유의 대축제(1664, 1668, 1674)
史叢(사총)
2016 .01
-
프랑스 파리 지역 역사 연구의 흐름과 특성
[TCHCCOS] 서울과 역사
2018 .10
-
파리의 집
월간에세이
2022 .04
-
월남 여성작가의 ‘이북’공간 —임옥인의 「월남전후」와 박순녀의 「어떤 파리」의 경우
여성문학연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-510-002859241