메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국정부학회 한국행정논집 한국행정논집 제26권 제4호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
711 - 733 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper begins with a brief narration about wage protests in the Cambodian garment industry, which broke out and became widespread in December 2013, and eventually resulted in aserious crackdown in January 2014. In an attempt to understand what went wrong in the wage protests in Cambodia’s largest industry, the authors delved into the minimum wage policy and realized that at the dawn of the protest, the minimum wage of garment workers was revised and set at US $100. However, the revised wage did not stop the protest, so the authors investigated the policy process of the garment industry minimum wage revision by inquiring about three important questions: (1) does this wage policy deliver what it intends to achieve; (2) why do workers continue to protest against this wage decision; and (3) how could the crisis be resolved? The authors reviewed the literature of the minimum wage and news from local and international sources to analyze what motivated the wage protest and how it evolved. The analysis isorganized and explained systematically by using the extended policy analysis model amended by Bill Jenkins (1978). The result of the analysis leads us to conclude that the recently set US $100minimum wage did not achieve the general policy objective or the state’s interest of maintaining attractive investment conditions in garment industry. The failure is attributed to the unfulfillment of workers’ socio-economic needs and interference of political interest in the wage protest. Through review and analysis, the authors conclude that the wage protest was captured by politics because the opposition party in Cambodia was able to rhetorically argue against government about corruption, collaboration between government and employers, and monopsony practice by the Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia (GMAC).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-350-001268520