메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
경찰대학 경찰학연구편집위원회 경찰학연구 경찰학연구 제11권 제2호(통권 제26호)
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
243 - 269 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
When people fought against governmental authority by power, the police booked them on suspicion of disturbance crime of affairs, not obstruction crime of the performance of official duties. because as behavior types the former included the word “power”, while the latter included only the word “assault and threat”. and the police interpreted that the word “affairs” in disturbance crime of affairs included the word “official duties” in obstruction crime of the performance of official duties. but recently The Korea Supreme Court judged that could not agree with the police`s opinion. I think The Korea Supreme Court judged illogical in some viewpoint of literally and unitedly interpretation of the word “affairs”, the need for protection of the performance of official duties, a gap of behavior types between disturbance crime of affairs and obstruction crime of the performance of official duties, the meaning of law-making in obstruction crime of the performance of official duties, cases of The Japan Supreme Court's ruling, difficulty in the performance of official duties at the scene of the accident etc. Thus, to punishment for obstruction of the performance of official duties by power, we have to enact the word “power” as behavior types in obstruction crime of the performance of official duties. Before the word “power” enact, the word “affairs” in disturbance crime of affairs must be interpreted that included the word “official duties”.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001374972