메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제4권
발행연도
1996.12
수록면
83 - 99 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyse the relationships between the middle school male student`s physique and physical fitness, and the appearance and non-appearance of pubic hairs. For the object, 17 students who had pubic hairs, and 21 students who didn`t have pubic hairs, were chosen from K middle school`s frist-year same calendar age male stunt. P local area. As a result, the following conclusions were produced after examining their physical fitness. 1. The stag of physique and pubic hair appearance The physique state of students who had pubic hues as follows. 1) Their height was, 4.47 ㎝ higher than other group. The difference was significant(p$lt;.05). 2) Their weight was 5.79 ㎏ heavier than other group. The difference was not significant. 3) Their chest circumference was 0.62 ㎝ larger than other group. The difference was not significant. 4) Their sitting-height was 2.58 ㎝ higher than other group. The difference was not significant. 5) Their Rohre`s index was 2.76 higher than other group. The difference was not significant. 2.The state of physical fitness and public hair appearance. The physical fitness state of students who had pubic hairs are as follows. 1) Their pull-ups were 0.73 times less than other group. The difference was not significant. 2) Their 100 m was 1.00 sec faster than other group. The difference was not significant. 3) Their standing-broad-jump was 8.45 ㎝ longer than other group. The difference was not significant. 4) Their sit-ups were 1.65 times/min more than other group. The difference was not significant. 5) Their softball throwing was 4.37 m longer than other group. The difference was not significant. 6)Their 1000 m running was 7.02 sec faster than other group. The difference was not significant. It was clearly proved that to physique state of the student, who had pubic hairs, was more developed than other group. Whereas, their physical fitness was not significantly developed when it is compared to their physical growth. In the educational institution, the difference of individual physique and physical fitness states should be clearly defined to provide a proper physical education and activities. The state of fitness and development is one of tie important physical basis for growing ages. Therefore, it is necessary to check the individual physical development conditions . through the physical education and activities, as the educational periods to the child ages and puberty ages are the most evident physical developing stages. To achieve this, the physical growth and development states should be clearly understood by physical education teachers, as well as, all teachers who are participating educational activities in the school. The purpose of physical fitness tests is to diagnose several fundamental physical elements, such as agility, power, muscular strength, and endurance, to figure out strong aspects and weak aspects. Currently, some of the physical fitness test categories are overlapped and implemented in the middle school. To improve and reform these phenomena, it is essential to review and re-examine these test categories.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

남자 운동선수들의 VO2max와 혈청 효소 및 호르몬 반응에 관한 비교 연구
고기준 ,  김태운 ,  이재규 한국체육교육학회지 2002 .09

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-692-001679324