지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.91 No.4
- 발행연도
- 2016.10
- 수록면
- 195 - 201 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery was previously accepted as an alternative surgical option in treatment for colorectal cancer. Nowadays, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is introduced as a method to maximize advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, SPLS has several limitations compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (CMLS). To overcome those limitations of SPLS, reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) was introduced. This study aimed at evaluating the short-term outcomes of RPLS.
Methods: Patients who underwent CMLS and RPLS of colon cancer between August 2011 and December 2013 were included in this study. Short-term clinical and pathological outcome were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: Thirty-two patients underwent RPLS and 217 patients underwent CMLS. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and faster bowel movement were shown in RPLS group in this study. In terms of postoperative pain, numeric rating scale (NRS) of RPLS was lower than that of CMLS. Significant differences were shown in terms of tumor size, harvested lymph node, perineural invasion, and pathological stage. No significant differences were confirmed in terms of other surgical outcomes.
Conclusion: In this study, RPLS was technically feasible and safe. Especially in terms of postoperative pain, RPLS was comparable to CMLS. RPLS may be a feasible alternative option in selected patients with colon cancer.
Methods: Patients who underwent CMLS and RPLS of colon cancer between August 2011 and December 2013 were included in this study. Short-term clinical and pathological outcome were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: Thirty-two patients underwent RPLS and 217 patients underwent CMLS. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and faster bowel movement were shown in RPLS group in this study. In terms of postoperative pain, numeric rating scale (NRS) of RPLS was lower than that of CMLS. Significant differences were shown in terms of tumor size, harvested lymph node, perineural invasion, and pathological stage. No significant differences were confirmed in terms of other surgical outcomes.
Conclusion: In this study, RPLS was technically feasible and safe. Especially in terms of postoperative pain, RPLS was comparable to CMLS. RPLS may be a feasible alternative option in selected patients with colon cancer.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for a Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Initial Experience With 20 Consecutive Cases
Annals of Coloproctology
2015 .01
-
Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator
Annals of Coloproctology
2018 .01
-
Will Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery Become the Future of Surgery for Colon Cancer?
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2017 .02
-
Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2024 .03
-
Laparoscopic Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Etiologic characteristics and index pregnancy outcomes of recurrent pregnancy losses in Korean women
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2016 .01
-
Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer are comparable to conventional open surgery
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .07
-
Laparoscopic Surgery in Children
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Analysis of Long-Term Oncologic Outcome and Risk Factors after Laparoscopic Converted Surgery of Colon Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for ColoRectal Cancer : Experience of First 10 years
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
-
Short-term Outcomes of 3-mm Versus 5-mm Ports for Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery: A Case-control Matched Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Ribosomal Protein L9 Maintains Stemness of Colorectal Cancer via an ID-1 Dependent Mechanism
대한암예방학회지
2024 .06
-
좌측 결장암에 대한 복강경수술: 임상 및 장기 종양학적 결과
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2016 .06
-
Impact of type of surgery on survival outcome in patients with early gallbladder cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery : Oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
Is the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program Effective and Safe in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Single-port Laparoscopic Liver Surgeries
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
-
Single port laparoscopic liver surgeries
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Single port access laparoscopic surgery for large adnexal tumors: Initial 51 cases of a single institute
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2017 .01
-
Early And Late Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Robotic And Laparoscopic Approach with Propensity Score Matching
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-514-001301426