인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
연구보고서
Full-text AI
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
The purpose of our study is to look for several mutual co-operative ways in order to solve the unbalanced problem in the demand and the supply of electricities among 17 regions from the electricity supply structure, i.e, its production in the non-Seoul Metropolitan Area and its consumption in Seoul Metropolitan Area, which is to be done by Gyeonggi Province from a perspective of an energy.
Main analytic results are as follows: first, the intra-region unbalance in the power electricity is very similar to the unbalance reflected by the environmental cost to the power, implying that the demand for the region-specific differential pricing by Chungnam Province, Incheon, and Busan makes sense logically. In fact, damages by running the power plant has been partly rewarded by related laws, but its compensation claims to be relatively small in three areas, especially in case of the electricity transmission. It also justifies the plausibility of region-specific differential pricing.
Second, the various supporting programs for residents residing the neighborhood of both the power plants and facilities of electricity transmission and distribution are being in progress. But it can be evaluated that the rewards are likely to be relatively bigger than the real damages and the areas damaged are confined to a specific spot. This assessment applies to the support for the neighborhood of its transmission and distribution, too.
Third, estimations of the repercussion effect from the price increase in the electricity used by industries only in Gyonggi Province lead to raising the consumer and the producer price index at the same time, and especially, the producer price index is expected to have the highest increase rate of all regions.
Fourth, the central government had better do the following actions: a revision of the electricity price system, a change in the operating method of the demand response and then introducing an intermediation market only for distributional electricities market.
Fifth, countermeasures for demanding the region-specific differential pricing are as follows: imposing carbon taxes on the coal used as fuel for the power plants, a positive implementation of the Paris Agreement for the climate change in 2016, utilizing the fund for mutual prosperity among provincial regions to support three provinces more quota than now, and so on.
These suggestions make us derive the following implications: more budget is inevitably needed, thus each province has to consider the merits and demerits and adjust them from the perspective of mutual positions.
Main analytic results are as follows: first, the intra-region unbalance in the power electricity is very similar to the unbalance reflected by the environmental cost to the power, implying that the demand for the region-specific differential pricing by Chungnam Province, Incheon, and Busan makes sense logically. In fact, damages by running the power plant has been partly rewarded by related laws, but its compensation claims to be relatively small in three areas, especially in case of the electricity transmission. It also justifies the plausibility of region-specific differential pricing.
Second, the various supporting programs for residents residing the neighborhood of both the power plants and facilities of electricity transmission and distribution are being in progress. But it can be evaluated that the rewards are likely to be relatively bigger than the real damages and the areas damaged are confined to a specific spot. This assessment applies to the support for the neighborhood of its transmission and distribution, too.
Third, estimations of the repercussion effect from the price increase in the electricity used by industries only in Gyonggi Province lead to raising the consumer and the producer price index at the same time, and especially, the producer price index is expected to have the highest increase rate of all regions.
Fourth, the central government had better do the following actions: a revision of the electricity price system, a change in the operating method of the demand response and then introducing an intermediation market only for distributional electricities market.
Fifth, countermeasures for demanding the region-specific differential pricing are as follows: imposing carbon taxes on the coal used as fuel for the power plants, a positive implementation of the Paris Agreement for the climate change in 2016, utilizing the fund for mutual prosperity among provincial regions to support three provinces more quota than now, and so on.
These suggestions make us derive the following implications: more budget is inevitably needed, thus each province has to consider the merits and demerits and adjust them from the perspective of mutual positions.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-309-002168564
