인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.9
- 수록면
- 1 - 7 (7page)
- DOI
- 10.17262/KJPH.2016.09.53.2.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
To compare the efficiency of nucleic acid extraction for identifying microbiomes in cervicovaginal samples between a commercial kit (chemagic viral DNA/RNA kit,Chemagen,Germany), conventionally applied method for diagnosing human papilloma virus infection, and the standard bead beating method. Cervicovaginal samples collected from 10 participants in the Healthy Twin Study were simultaneously subjected to the two different DNA extraction methods. Extracted DNA was amplified by nested-PCR and analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), DGGE profiling, and phylogenetic sequencing based on the Greengenes database. Although chemagic kit method produced slightly more diverse bands compared to bead beating method, DGGE band patterns were very similar between the two methods for 60% of samples. Multi-dimensional scaling analysis of the DGGE fingerprints revealed randomly distributed bacterial community compositions with both methods. An unweighted pair group analysis using arithmetic average clustering showed that the clustering of DGGE fingerprints was not related to the DNA extraction method. With the bead beating method, Lactobacillus sp. and Enterobacteriaceae were found most often; Lactobacillus sp. and Pseudomonas spp. were more common with the chemagic kit method. According to UniFrac distance analysis, the microbial communities by phylogenetic analysis did not differ significantly between the two methods. DNA extraction using a commercial chemagic kit did not cause significant difference in an analysis of the vaginal microbiome, compared with the bead beating method. These findings suggest that commercial nucleic acid extraction kits would be useful for analyzing the cervicovaginal microbiome, with comparable efficiency and greater convenience than the bead beating extraction method. This study will help to investigate the effect of vaginal microbiota on women’ health.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Discussion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-517-002240910
