인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 284 (284page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
The aim of this study and research is to understand the current situation and the policy including the law about the secret trade infringement related with China. Korea made a free trade agreement with China in 2014, Korea and China are going to share common market between two countries. The policy about the secret trade infringement may vary in their own situation, each country has their characteristic about national culture, company culture and individual rights that can affect the protection of secret trade.
Korea and China become a economic community and living community in the present, such tendencies make two countries recognize common problems and feel the necessity to establish common organization that can discuss the legal issues.
Korea government needs to ascertain the education and publicity about the protection of the secret trade and let the Korean companies including the Korean companies in China know the current situation about the infringement of secret trade and legal problems.
Each country has their own criminal policy about the protection of the secret trade because the severity of punishment of the secret trade infringement can affect the economic development especially for the developing countries, but the proper protection of intellectual property including the trade secret is beneficial to the common economic community and the common market.
Korea and China including the other countries in Northeast Asia are going to share a living territory and economic market, they need to discuss a common regulation and the sorts of the proper punishment about the secret trade infringement for their co-prosperity.
The mutual assistance in criminal matters between Korea and China has been performing well in principle, but several problems like cyber crime and the secret trade infringement are difficult to discuss and hard to share the common regulation due to some problems like the establishment of the jurisdiction and the difference of the legal requirement based on their legal policy and legislative adjustment.
Above all, Korea and China including many countries in Northeast Asia need to have more chance and much time to share the common recognition and the joint confrontation about the secret trade infringement including the proper reflection of the agreement of TRIPS, nevertheless the confusion of the common rule in Northeast Asia.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지Korea and China become a economic community and living community in the present, such tendencies make two countries recognize common problems and feel the necessity to establish common organization that can discuss the legal issues.
Korea government needs to ascertain the education and publicity about the protection of the secret trade and let the Korean companies including the Korean companies in China know the current situation about the infringement of secret trade and legal problems.
Each country has their own criminal policy about the protection of the secret trade because the severity of punishment of the secret trade infringement can affect the economic development especially for the developing countries, but the proper protection of intellectual property including the trade secret is beneficial to the common economic community and the common market.
Korea and China including the other countries in Northeast Asia are going to share a living territory and economic market, they need to discuss a common regulation and the sorts of the proper punishment about the secret trade infringement for their co-prosperity.
The mutual assistance in criminal matters between Korea and China has been performing well in principle, but several problems like cyber crime and the secret trade infringement are difficult to discuss and hard to share the common regulation due to some problems like the establishment of the jurisdiction and the difference of the legal requirement based on their legal policy and legislative adjustment.
Above all, Korea and China including many countries in Northeast Asia need to have more chance and much time to share the common recognition and the joint confrontation about the secret trade infringement including the proper reflection of the agreement of TRIPS, nevertheless the confusion of the common rule in Northeast Asia.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- [표지]
- [발간사]
- [목차]
- 표차례
- [국문요약]
- [제1장 서론]
- 제1절 연구의 의의와 필요성
- 제2절 연구의 내용과 방법
- [제2장 한국의 중국관련 영업비밀침해 범죄의 사례와 현황 및 관련기관]
- 제1절 한국의 중국 관련 영업비밀침해 범죄의 사례와 특성
- 제2절 한국의 중국관련 영업비밀침해 범죄의 현황
- 제3절 한국의 영업비밀보호 관련 기관
- [제3장 중국의 영업비밀보호]
- 제1절 중국 영업비밀보호의 범위와 요건
- 제2절 중국 영업비밀보호 관련 법률
- 제3절 중국에서 영업비밀의 형사법적 보호
- [제4장 영업비밀보호에 관한 정책적 제언 - 비교법적 검토를 중심으로]
- 제1절 서언
- 제2절 영업비밀보호의 요건
- 제3절 영업비밀보호 법제의 연혁
- 제4절 영업비밀에 대한 민사적 보호
- 제5절 영업비밀의 형사법적 보호
- [제5장 논의의 종합 및 결론]
- [참고문헌]
- [Abstract]
- [부록]
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-364-001998950