지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.92 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2017.3
- 수록면
- 149 - 155 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The aim of this study was to verify that laparoscopic resection for treating retroperitoneal benign neurilemmoma (NL) is expected to be favorable for complete resection of tumor with technical feasibility and safety.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 47 operations for retroperitoneal neurogenic tumor at Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital and Gangnam Severance Hospital between January 2005 and September 2015. After excluding 21 patients, the remaining 26 were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent open surgery (OS) and those who underwent laparoscopic surgery (LS). We compared clinicopathological features between the 2 groups.
Results: There was no significant difference in operation time, estimated blood loss, transfusion, complication, recurrence, or follow-up period between 2 groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LS group versus the OS group (OS vs. LS, 7.00 ± 3.43 days vs. 4.50 ± 2.16 days; P = 0.031).
Conclusion: We suggest that laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal benign NL is feasible and safe by obtaining complete resection of the tumor. LS for treating retroperitoneal benign NL could be useful with appropriate laparoscopic technique and proper patient selection.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 47 operations for retroperitoneal neurogenic tumor at Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital and Gangnam Severance Hospital between January 2005 and September 2015. After excluding 21 patients, the remaining 26 were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent open surgery (OS) and those who underwent laparoscopic surgery (LS). We compared clinicopathological features between the 2 groups.
Results: There was no significant difference in operation time, estimated blood loss, transfusion, complication, recurrence, or follow-up period between 2 groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LS group versus the OS group (OS vs. LS, 7.00 ± 3.43 days vs. 4.50 ± 2.16 days; P = 0.031).
Conclusion: We suggest that laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal benign NL is feasible and safe by obtaining complete resection of the tumor. LS for treating retroperitoneal benign NL could be useful with appropriate laparoscopic technique and proper patient selection.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Das Gupta TK / 1969 / Benign solitary Schwannomas(neurilemomas) / Cancer 24 : 355 ~ 366
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Mrugala MM / 2005 / Peripheral and cranial nerve sheath tumors / Curr Opin Neurol 18 : 604 ~ 610
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Nah YW / 2005 / Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma : surgical consideration / Hepatogastroenterology 52 : 1681 ~ 1684
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Kapila K / 2002 / Schwannomas : a pitfall in the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenomas on fine-needle aspiration cytology / Diagn Cytopathol 27 : 53 ~ 59
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Pinson CW / 1989 / Long-term results with primary retroperitoneal tumors / Arch Surg 124 : 1168 ~ 1173
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Mrugala MM / 2005 / Peripheral and cranial nerve sheath tumors / Curr Opin Neurol 18 : 604 ~ 610
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Nah YW / 2005 / Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma : surgical consideration / Hepatogastroenterology 52 : 1681 ~ 1684
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Kapila K / 2002 / Schwannomas : a pitfall in the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenomas on fine-needle aspiration cytology / Diagn Cytopathol 27 : 53 ~ 59
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Pinson CW / 1989 / Long-term results with primary retroperitoneal tumors / Arch Surg 124 : 1168 ~ 1173
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Affiliation and corresponding author correction : Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal benign neurilemmoma
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .05
-
Laparoscopic S1 resection
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] Clinical Feasibility of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Tumors in Segments 7 or 8
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Development of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Korea
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
Retroperitoneal sarcomas: Outcomes of repeated resections
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2020 .12
-
Outcome of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Patients with Old Age
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Repeated resections are not associated with adverse outcome for retroperitoneal sarcomas
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Early experience of laparoscopic liver resection: A single institution experience with 37 consecutive cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2019 .05
-
Laparoscopic liver resection for locally advanced tumor
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Initial experience of laparoscopic liver resection in a community hospital: A case-series
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Indication of Resection & End-Laparoscopic Resection For Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Comparative study of Laparoscopic Liver Resection and Open Liver Resection in Patients over 70 years of age.
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Laparoscopic System
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Single Port Laparoscopic Liver Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
What Kind of Energy Device Do You Choose during Laparoscopic Liver Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Laparoscopic Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Surgical techniques of laparoscopic repeat liver resection
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Initial experience with laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy in single tertiary center
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2021 .12
-
Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2024 .03
-
Resection first
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-514-002247292