인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 213 (213page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
The employment restriction under Art. 56 of the Protection of Children and Adolescents against Sexual Abuse Act automatically bans sex offenders from being employed at certain types of work places for 10 years, if the offense resulted in criminal conviction. The ban does not allow room for discretion by a judge as to whether such ban should be sanctioned or for how long. The Korean Constitutional Court has recently held that such ban is unconstitutional
The Korean Constitutional Court gave examples of legislation in which an employment ban can overcome constitutionality issue: for example, the judge presiding the criminal sentencing can determine the likelihood of repeat offense, or a stratified system that sanctions employment ban in proportion to the likelihood of repeat offense can be used. The German legislation, which was also mentioned in the Constitutional Court opinion, requires that the offender committed his or her crime in abuse of his or her profession before employment ban can be sanctioned. As these examples suggest, in order to overcome constitutionality challenge, the employment ban under the law should allow a judge to individualize employment ban based on the likelihood of repeat sex offense. It should also be considered if employment ban should be triggered only if the previous employment was abused in the offense.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지The Korean Constitutional Court gave examples of legislation in which an employment ban can overcome constitutionality issue: for example, the judge presiding the criminal sentencing can determine the likelihood of repeat offense, or a stratified system that sanctions employment ban in proportion to the likelihood of repeat offense can be used. The German legislation, which was also mentioned in the Constitutional Court opinion, requires that the offender committed his or her crime in abuse of his or her profession before employment ban can be sanctioned. As these examples suggest, in order to overcome constitutionality challenge, the employment ban under the law should allow a judge to individualize employment ban based on the likelihood of repeat sex offense. It should also be considered if employment ban should be triggered only if the previous employment was abused in the offense.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- [표지]
- [요약문]
- Ⅰ. 제목
- Ⅱ. 연구의 목적 및 필요성
- Ⅲ. 연구의 내용 및 범위
- Ⅳ. 연구결과
- Ⅴ. 연구결과의 활용계획
- [SUMMARY]
- [목차]
- 표목차
- [제1장 서론]
- [제2장 국내 선행연구 분석]
- [제3장 연구수행 내용 및 결과]
- 제1절 서설
- 제2절 청소년성보호법 제56조 이하의 취업제한 개관
- 제3절 아동 · 청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제56조 제1항의 법리적 검토
- 제4절 취업제한 관련 헌법재판소 결정 평석
- 제5절 성범죄자 취업제한의 비교법적 검토
- [제4장 연구목표 달성도 및 대외기여도]
- 제1절 여성가족부의 취업제한 제도 개선안 검토
- 제2절 취업제한 제도 개선방향 제언
- [제5장 연구결과의 활용계획]
- [제6장 참고문헌]
- [별첨]
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-510-002240248
