지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.6
- 수록면
- 247 - 271 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although the order of Cold War formed after the 2nd World War created East and West Germany model of divided country in Europe, Yemen model of divided country in Middle East, and China and Taiwan, Vietnam, and the Korean peninsula model of divided country in Asia, it is already well-known that all the nations stated above except the Korean peninsula have formed unified economic community inside each of the nations. For example, East and West Germany went through many different political and military conflicts in the beginning of division of the country, but they achieved complete economic integration after 18 years since 1972 when they concluded basic agreement and launched normal general trade. China and Taiwan also went through China’s Quemoy Island in the 1950s and missile tests in the Taiwan Strait during the 1990s, but they formed Chinese Economic Community called Chaiwan by signing Cross-border Privacy Enforcement (CPEA) in 2010, resulting from sustained trade between two countries. On the other hand,
how is the Korean Peninsula? Notwithstanding 25 years of history of trade between the north and south, it gradually only goes backwards, barely surviving only with the Kaesong Industrial Complex the DMZ Frontier Zone. Not to mention eased political and military tensions between the north and south through expansion of economic relations, they remain in a state of intermittent lower-intensity political and military confrontation amid the backward movement of economic relationship.
While in the backwardness of the economic relationship between the north and south in the recent years, the economy of North Korea has been weighted on the economic zone in China accounting for about 90% of international trade, and recently started economic cooperation in the field of infrastructure between North Korea and Russia. Further, this has brought out change in economic policy of North Korea. As Kim Jong-un’s regime has passed a law on special economic zones to set up many economic development district in regions, he has exerted more efforts to expand foreign intercourses, compared to Kim Jong-il’s era. Definitely, Kim Jong-un’s regime does not intend to change existing foreign survival policy strategy as it claims to the parallel line between economy and nuclear power as a key economy policy. Nonetheless, Kim Jong-un’s regime has expanded foreign economy relationship by implementing policy embracing the market, compared to Kim Jong-il’s era. Under these circumstances, a large-sized regional economic development led by China has been promoted in a full scale in the norther area of the Korean Peninsula.
Hence, we now need to take off the North and South Korean economic relations under new paradigm. Namely, from a perspective of North Korean development, development of regional economic development district set forth by North Korea should be promoted in a 3-dimension way or many-sided way with Northern Economic Zone. Development of economic relation between the north and south should be promoted as new engine growth for the economy of South Korea. Furthermore, the economic relation between the north and south should be promoted from a perspective of regional economic development expanding in a full scale in the Northern Economic Zone including China and Russia. Since the post-Cold War South Korea has not used overland transport as logistics network resulting from discontinuity of Eurasia continent, falling into geo-economic missing as it is not connected to Northern Economic Zone through overland transport. In this regard, South Korea lost geo-economic advantages of the Korean Peninsula belonging to the bridge between the continent and sea. This indicates ‘a disabled geo-economic condition’. Now, unless South Korea break through the condition, the nation will not easily escape from ‘middle income trap’. Namely, South Korea can take a new leap only if it should construct a compound state connecting with the continent and sea.
When it comes to compose sea-continent composite vector embracing Eurasia and the northern area for the deformed vector of national development solely depending on maritime power for the last 60 years or so, the development of economic relationship between the north and south and the construction of economic community have emerged to an issue of our survival strategy before we knew beyond the directing point of unification.
how is the Korean Peninsula? Notwithstanding 25 years of history of trade between the north and south, it gradually only goes backwards, barely surviving only with the Kaesong Industrial Complex the DMZ Frontier Zone. Not to mention eased political and military tensions between the north and south through expansion of economic relations, they remain in a state of intermittent lower-intensity political and military confrontation amid the backward movement of economic relationship.
While in the backwardness of the economic relationship between the north and south in the recent years, the economy of North Korea has been weighted on the economic zone in China accounting for about 90% of international trade, and recently started economic cooperation in the field of infrastructure between North Korea and Russia. Further, this has brought out change in economic policy of North Korea. As Kim Jong-un’s regime has passed a law on special economic zones to set up many economic development district in regions, he has exerted more efforts to expand foreign intercourses, compared to Kim Jong-il’s era. Definitely, Kim Jong-un’s regime does not intend to change existing foreign survival policy strategy as it claims to the parallel line between economy and nuclear power as a key economy policy. Nonetheless, Kim Jong-un’s regime has expanded foreign economy relationship by implementing policy embracing the market, compared to Kim Jong-il’s era. Under these circumstances, a large-sized regional economic development led by China has been promoted in a full scale in the norther area of the Korean Peninsula.
Hence, we now need to take off the North and South Korean economic relations under new paradigm. Namely, from a perspective of North Korean development, development of regional economic development district set forth by North Korea should be promoted in a 3-dimension way or many-sided way with Northern Economic Zone. Development of economic relation between the north and south should be promoted as new engine growth for the economy of South Korea. Furthermore, the economic relation between the north and south should be promoted from a perspective of regional economic development expanding in a full scale in the Northern Economic Zone including China and Russia. Since the post-Cold War South Korea has not used overland transport as logistics network resulting from discontinuity of Eurasia continent, falling into geo-economic missing as it is not connected to Northern Economic Zone through overland transport. In this regard, South Korea lost geo-economic advantages of the Korean Peninsula belonging to the bridge between the continent and sea. This indicates ‘a disabled geo-economic condition’. Now, unless South Korea break through the condition, the nation will not easily escape from ‘middle income trap’. Namely, South Korea can take a new leap only if it should construct a compound state connecting with the continent and sea.
When it comes to compose sea-continent composite vector embracing Eurasia and the northern area for the deformed vector of national development solely depending on maritime power for the last 60 years or so, the development of economic relationship between the north and south and the construction of economic community have emerged to an issue of our survival strategy before we knew beyond the directing point of unification.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 김정은정권의 경제개발구 추진 배경
Ⅲ. 경제개발구 추진 내용과 과제
Ⅳ. 남북경제공동체 형성 대비 남북경제협력의 과제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
남북 개발협력을 통한 북한 경제개발구 개발 연구
토지주택연구
2015 .04
-
김정은 시대의 대외개방정책과 남북경제협력: 경제개발구 전략을 활용한 새로운 협력모델의 모색
평화학연구
2017 .12
-
북한의 대외경제관계가 남북경제협력에 주는 시사점
인문사회 21
2023 .04
-
북한의 경제정책 변화와 남북 경제협력
국토
2018 .09
-
개성지역 남북합영회사의 법적 쟁점에 관한 연구
원광법학
2023 .06
-
2016년 대북제재 이후 북한경제 변화와 신남북협력 방향
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2019 .12
-
중·북 경제협력과 북한의 경제발전 전망
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2015 .12
-
3. 남북 경제협력 추진 방안
통일전략포럼 보고서
2018 .04
-
지방자치단체의 남북경협 참여방안 연구: 멀티트랙이론을 중심으로
한국지방공기업학회보
2019 .01
-
남북경제협력방안으로서 자유무역협정(FTA)의 전략적 활용방안 : OPZ활용 사례를 중심으로
관세학회지
2015 .05
-
남북교류협력 기반조성을 위한 국토계획과 발전방향 연구
한국지적학회지
2021 .01
-
KDI 북한경제리뷰 2023년 4월
[KDI] 북한경제리뷰
2023 .04
-
북한 유통시장의 환경과 남북 유통협력 방안에 관한 연구
무역보험연구
2021 .01
-
Sunrise, Sunset: The Rise and Fall of Inter-Korean Economic Relations
국제관계연구
2020 .12
-
남북협력 동향분석 : 중점 협력분야와 행위자를 중심으로
한국동북아논총
2019 .06
-
통일을 위한 남북한 경제협력전략과 조직화 방안: 독일 통일로부터의 교훈
질서경제저널
2016 .06
-
북한의 경제개발구 추진 현황과 향후 과제
[KIEP] 오늘의 세계경제
2015 .04
-
북한 개발협력에 관한 연구경향과 대안이론 검토- 법사회학 이론을 중심으로 -
입법학연구
2020 .01
-
북한의 수용성과 남북교류협력 방향: 김정은 시기 관광정책을 중심으로
한국동북아논총
2021 .03
-
KDI 북한경제리뷰 2024년 9월
[KDI] 북한경제리뷰
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-309-000797238