지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제104호
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 159 - 188 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2017.06.104.159
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article are various concepts and titles which were used to indicate or mean Dynastic capitals(“Gukdo, 國都”) in studies of Korean ancient history. There are many examples of such terms, such as Capital City (“Doseong, 都城”), Royal Capital(“Wangdo, 王都”), and the Royal city (“Wang’ gyeong, 王京”). Results from an analysis of the History of the Three Kingdoms (“Samguk Sagi”) suggest that Royal Capital(“Wangdo, 王都”) was the term which was most prominently used by Goguryeo, Baekje and Shilla, in reference to the capital.
Nak’yang-seong of the Chinese Northern Wi(北魏) dynasty, and Jang’an-seong of Su and Dang dynasties, are usually cited as the model of East Asian capitals. There was an outer fortress, and the inside of the city featured a grid pattern. This is generally called as the ‘Capital City (“Doseong-je”) System.’ This Chinese-style system was also embraced by capitals of Korea and Japan, and royal capitals with the form of a ‘Doseong’ were eventually formed in Korea as well. The time when a ‘Royal capital’ with the form of a ‘Doseong Capital City’ in Goguryeo first appeared was the second half of the 6th century, when a namesake of the Chinese Jang’an-seong city was constructed in the Pyeong’yang region, featuring an outer perimeter fortress to outline the city, and a clear grid pattern applied to the city’s internal design. Considering all this, it would be improper and inadequate to refer to even the royal capitals that ‘preceded’ Goguryeo’s Jang’an-seong as “Doseong.”
Meanwhile, ‘Wang’gyeong’ has been used in a way very similar to how ‘Wangdo’ was used conceptually. But the term ‘Wang’gyeong’ also had an added nuance of referring to an ‘urban area,’ where people and resources tended to converge. While ‘Wangdo’ was rather a generic term usually referring to the place where the king lived, ‘Wang’gyeong’ also implied that the referred place in question was highly developed and also urbanized. Subtle differences in the meaning of these terms urge us to be careful in using them, and if necessary use them in a differentiated manner.
Nak’yang-seong of the Chinese Northern Wi(北魏) dynasty, and Jang’an-seong of Su and Dang dynasties, are usually cited as the model of East Asian capitals. There was an outer fortress, and the inside of the city featured a grid pattern. This is generally called as the ‘Capital City (“Doseong-je”) System.’ This Chinese-style system was also embraced by capitals of Korea and Japan, and royal capitals with the form of a ‘Doseong’ were eventually formed in Korea as well. The time when a ‘Royal capital’ with the form of a ‘Doseong Capital City’ in Goguryeo first appeared was the second half of the 6th century, when a namesake of the Chinese Jang’an-seong city was constructed in the Pyeong’yang region, featuring an outer perimeter fortress to outline the city, and a clear grid pattern applied to the city’s internal design. Considering all this, it would be improper and inadequate to refer to even the royal capitals that ‘preceded’ Goguryeo’s Jang’an-seong as “Doseong.”
Meanwhile, ‘Wang’gyeong’ has been used in a way very similar to how ‘Wangdo’ was used conceptually. But the term ‘Wang’gyeong’ also had an added nuance of referring to an ‘urban area,’ where people and resources tended to converge. While ‘Wangdo’ was rather a generic term usually referring to the place where the king lived, ‘Wang’gyeong’ also implied that the referred place in question was highly developed and also urbanized. Subtle differences in the meaning of these terms urge us to be careful in using them, and if necessary use them in a differentiated manner.
목차
머리말
1. 왕도 · 도성 관련 용어의 용례 분석
2. 왕도와 도성 · 왕경 개념의 설정과 적용
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고구려 ‘도성제’론의 궤적과 함의
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
高句麗 國內城期의 도성 경관과 토지 이용
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
A Reconsideration of the Goguryeo Capital System
Korea Journal
2025 .03
-
진도(珍島) 용장성(龍藏城)의 구조와 성격
한국중세고고학
2018 .06
-
중국 진한시기 기후·수계환경 변화와 도성입지 및 배도제 운영과의 상관성
호서고고학
2021 .01
-
고구려 王都, 王畿의 형성 과정과 성격
한국고대사연구
2016 .03
-
益山与东亚古代都城
마한백제문화
2024 .06
-
발해 금군과 도성방어체계
역사와현실
2015 .09
-
中國 古代 陪都制의 形成과 類型 -古代 韓國 都城의 復都制 검토를 위한 예찰-
중앙고고연구
2016 .01
-
발해 도성과 지방통치
고구려발해연구
2017 .07
-
고구려 도성 경관의 형성과 지배 권력의 추이
한국고대사연구
2019 .09
-
부여 도성 연구의 현황과 과제
고조선단군학
2024 .08
-
백제 사비도성 일대 고분의 분포양상과 의미
한국상고사학보
2021 .11
-
고구려 도시 연구 試論
사림
2022 .10
-
Revisiting the Dynamics of Social Capital, Government Performance, and Trust in Government: Evidence from South Korea
Korea Observer
2020 .01
-
백제 熊津 都城의 왕궁 위치와 조영과정
이화사학연구
2017 .01
-
누가 성(城) 무너진 데를 막을 것인가
신학지남
2016 .09
-
고려 치소성 건설에 동원된 지방군에 관한 새로운 기와 명문 : 固城의 保勝軍 一品軍 二品軍 養戶의 기와 명문 사례
목간과문자
2018 .12
-
천군계 소설에 드러난 심성 표현 방식과 자기 마음 이해 교육으로의 활용 가능성
어문연구(語文硏究)
2020 .01
-
권력지성·신앙의 交應 - 안사의 난 이후 雙忠 기억의 형성과 전개 -
동양사학연구
2024 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001052263