메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(이화여자대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第235輯
발행연도
수록면
159 - 210 (52page)
DOI
10.16912/tkhr.2017.9.235.159

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

This thesis examined the results to be studied on the late Joseon Dynasty which was made public for two years from 2015 to 2016. As a result, there were 149 books, 53 doctoral dissertations, and 1,184 thesis which were published on the academic history journal.
When I organized the results to be researched for the past two year, new attempts appeared to be made at all fields. First of all, the political history was changed from the point of view to be divided into faction politics, Tangpyeong politics, and power politics separately to the view about the continuity of before and after Tangpyeong politics . The perspective which Tangpyeong was politically resulted from the faction politics, and the power politics was politically resulted from Tangpyeong will help understand the late Joseon Dynasty plentifully.
On the social history, the breaking up or cracks in trends to strengthen the kinship system of patriarchy since the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century have come out with analyzing various cases. On the history of thought, also, while being argued with Sinocentrism or Silhak , there have been continued to criticize the discussion on Sinocentrism or to evaluate the breaking away from Sinocentrism, and to have a question and to make an issue on the modernity of Silhak . I can find the meaning that the formation and development of Silhak was campared with approach of East-Asia.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
  2. Ⅱ. 분야별 주요 저술과 연구 동향
  3. Ⅲ. 나가는 말
  4. 참고문헌
  5. Abstract

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기