지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 201 - 207 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: The blunted tip of a reusable with multiple uses can cause problems with the passing procedure in arthroscopic Bankart repair. This study assessed the advantage of Scorpion with a 70° arthroscope in arthroscopic Bankart repair compared to hook typed suture passer.
Methods: Scorpion in 19 patients, the hook type suture passer (conventional group) in 18 patients were used. All patients underwent the same procedure except for the type of suture passer used. Another different point of the procedure were telescopes and the number of portals used; three arthroscopic portals (posterior, anterorsuperiorlateral, and mid-anterior) and a 30° arthroscope in the conventional group, but two portals and a 70° arthroscope as well as the 30° one in the Scorpion group. The surgery time and the surgical complications including an iatrogenic axillary nerve injury were recorded.
Results: The Scorpion group showed a significant decrease in surgery time compared to the conventional group. In contrast to the conventional group, Scorpion provided an easy estimation of the exit of suture passing, no iatrogenic labral injury during the passing procedure with straight movement and the sharp tip of the knife installed. Iatrogenic supraspinatus injuries could be avoided when making an accessory anteosuperiorlateral portal due to the 70° arthroscope.
Conclusions: In arthroscopic Bankart repair, the use of the Scorpion suture passer and a 70° arthroscope can reduce the surgery time, avoid unnecessary supraspinatus injury, and avoid iatrogenic axillary nerve damage through the relatively easy and precise suture passing and saving of the anterosuperior portal.
Methods: Scorpion in 19 patients, the hook type suture passer (conventional group) in 18 patients were used. All patients underwent the same procedure except for the type of suture passer used. Another different point of the procedure were telescopes and the number of portals used; three arthroscopic portals (posterior, anterorsuperiorlateral, and mid-anterior) and a 30° arthroscope in the conventional group, but two portals and a 70° arthroscope as well as the 30° one in the Scorpion group. The surgery time and the surgical complications including an iatrogenic axillary nerve injury were recorded.
Results: The Scorpion group showed a significant decrease in surgery time compared to the conventional group. In contrast to the conventional group, Scorpion provided an easy estimation of the exit of suture passing, no iatrogenic labral injury during the passing procedure with straight movement and the sharp tip of the knife installed. Iatrogenic supraspinatus injuries could be avoided when making an accessory anteosuperiorlateral portal due to the 70° arthroscope.
Conclusions: In arthroscopic Bankart repair, the use of the Scorpion suture passer and a 70° arthroscope can reduce the surgery time, avoid unnecessary supraspinatus injury, and avoid iatrogenic axillary nerve damage through the relatively easy and precise suture passing and saving of the anterosuperior portal.
목차
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Scorpion을 이용한 관절경적 Bankart병변 봉합술의 장점: 관절와 하부 테두리 연골의 봉합시 유용성
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .07
-
Characteristics of muscle performance in Patients with Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
Knee Surgery and Related Research
2020 .01
-
Are there differences in clinical outcomes between adolescent and adult with arthroscopic Bankart repair?
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
Is the Arthroscopic “Multiple Pulled Suture” Technique a Good Solution for Large or Comminuted Bony Bankart Lesions
대한견주관절의학회지
2017 .09
-
Conservative management against arthroscopic Bankart repair for first-time anterior shoulder instability
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .04
-
Long term follow-up of arthroscopic bankart repair for recurrent shoulder dislocation.
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
Peri-anchor cyst formation after arthroscopic bankart repair: comparison between biocomposite suture anchor and all-suture anchor
대한견주관절의학회지
2020 .12
-
Arthroscopic Capsular Repair without Relaying Sutures: ‘Simple Sewing Technique’
대한견주관절의학회지
2019 .09
-
Comparison of work performance in shoulder arthroscopy with wide angle lens and conventional 30 degree arthroscope
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
Clinical Results of the Arthroscopic “Multiple Pulled Suture” Technique for Large or Comminuted Bony Bankart Lesion
대한견주관절의학회지
2017 .09
-
관절경 하 방카르트 봉합술에서 봉합방식에 따른 임상적 영상의학적 결과 비교
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .03
-
How does the perianchor cyst change following arthroscopic labral repair using all-suture anchor ?
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
전 봉합 나사를 이용한 관절경하 반카트 봉합술시의 임상 결과 : 생체 흡수성 나 사와 비교 연구
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .03
-
Clinical outcome and glenoid morphology after arthroscopic chronic bony bankart repair: A 5 to 8 year follow-up
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
Bankart 병변의 관절경적 복원술 후 한방 재활치료 프로토콜을 적용하여 호전된 증례 보고
대한한의학회지
2019 .09
-
Glenoid rim fracture through anchor points after arthroscopic bankart repair for shoulder instability
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
관절경하 반카트 봉합술에서 전 봉합 나사의 삽입 위치와 각도가 안정성에 영향을 미치는가? : 생체 역학 분석
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .03
-
The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2016 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0