메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
李沅埈 (인천대학교)
저널정보
중국근현대사학회 중국근현대사연구 中國近現代史硏究 第76輯
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
207 - 243 (37page)
DOI
10.29323/mchina.2017.12.76.207

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Until Beijing was proclaimed as the new capital of the People’s Republic of China in October 1949, there were a number of controversies in the first half of the 20th century on China’s new capital. The debate of the 1940s was the most important one in its scale and influence. When the war against Japan was coming to an end, scholars and intellectuals of China argued on which city was the most appropriate for the capital city of postwar China. The debate had continued after the war, and it came to its’ peak in the National Assembly in December 1946. Different opinions and aspects on the postwar new state building were brought up, and therefore we can see what kind of ideas had competed for the construction of ‘New China’ in the 1940s Chinese society by analyzing this debate.
Writers who supported Beijing as the new capital have argued that Beijing is suitable for the new capital based on military strategic considerations, economic aspects(industrialization), historical experience, geographical conditions, cultural characteristics, convenience of transportation, and climatic conditions, etc. These various reasons can be broadly integrated into three categories, which are ‘legacy of the past’, ‘present conditions’, ‘future prospects’. They have argued that Beijing should once again become the capital city based on China’s historical experience and the age old ideas derived from it. And also, Beijing’s geographical conditions, pleasant climate, convenient transportation and fully equipped urban facilities were considered to be more suitable for postwar capital than other cities in terms of ‘present conditions’. In addition, by predicting postwar China’s military dangers and establishing the major national construction projects, the authors argued that Beijing will be the best place to deal with these problems. They had anticipated the construction of a new nation through praising Beijing’s historical heritage, realistic conditions, and the possibility of the future.
One important feature we can find is the inclination of thinking about China’s postwar national security. Not to speak of the military strategic point, even from the economic point of view, the authors insisted on industrialization for defense construction. Also, they had emphasized that it is beneficial for internal and external control even when they were analyzing the conveniences of traffic or geographical advantages. It is somewhat resonable in that in the Chinese society of the 1940s, which had been subjected to long-term warfare, the task of securing the safety of ‘New China’ became the first among others.

목차

머리말
Ⅰ. 1946년의 국민대회와 북경 건도론
Ⅱ. ‘과거의 유산’: 역사의 경험과 오래된 관념
Ⅲ. ‘현재의 조건’ : 준비된 도시, 북경
Ⅳ. ‘미래에 대한 전망’ : 최소의 위험, 최대의 가능성
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (60)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-912-001704376