인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
구로사와 아키라의 《산 자의 기록(生きものの記錄)》에 관한 고찰 : 흥행의 실패요인과 제작의도를 중심으로 A Study on the 《Record of A Living Being》 by Kurosawa Akira - Focusing on Factors of Box-Office Failure and Purpose of Production -
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중앙대학교 일본연구소 일본연구 일본연구 제48집
- 발행연도
- 2018.2
- 수록면
- 261 - 284 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.20404/jscau.2018.02.48.261
구로사와 아키라의 《산 자의 기록(生きものの記錄)》에 관한 고찰 : 흥행의 실패요인과 제작의도를 중심으로
초록·키워드
This paper considers an atomic bomb film 《Record of A Living Being》 by Kurosawa. As this study related the director’s purpose of production to viewers(audiences)’ criticism and social environment related to causes for the box-office failure of this film, it is differentiated from the existing researches. 《Record of A Living Being》 is the only work that has failed in box-office out of Kurosawa’s works. As an external factor of failure, the situation of the time could be pointed out. In the second half of 1955 when the film was released, the atomic energy was promoted as ‘the second sun’ because ‘the national policy’ aiming to develop the peaceful use of atomic bomb and atomic development as peace industry was supported.
As internal factors of failure, first, audiences could not identify the main character Nakajima’s ‘fear’ and leaving for Brazil with their own fear, which was considered as incoherent. Second, the ‘family drama’ surrounding the inheritance of property between family members was highlighted, so that the main ‘nuclear’ issue got ambiguous. However, contrary to the existing atomic bomb films, the director did not give the experience of radiation exposure to Nakajima and his family, and even did not contain any cruel scenes of radiation exposure. The director aimed to show the fact that ordinary people without concrete damage should feel ‘fear’ as ‘special fear’ would not be caused by special damage by atomic bomb. Also, conflicting Nakajima’s anxiety of atomic bomb with the family’s financial concern by disguising it as ‘family drama’, the director effectively presents the essential critical mind of atomic bomb threatening lives. Moreover, observing Nakajima’s ‘fear’ in the third-party position of a doctor Harada, the director objectively materializes Nakajima’s abstract warning of atomic bomb.
As internal factors of failure, first, audiences could not identify the main character Nakajima’s ‘fear’ and leaving for Brazil with their own fear, which was considered as incoherent. Second, the ‘family drama’ surrounding the inheritance of property between family members was highlighted, so that the main ‘nuclear’ issue got ambiguous. However, contrary to the existing atomic bomb films, the director did not give the experience of radiation exposure to Nakajima and his family, and even did not contain any cruel scenes of radiation exposure. The director aimed to show the fact that ordinary people without concrete damage should feel ‘fear’ as ‘special fear’ would not be caused by special damage by atomic bomb. Also, conflicting Nakajima’s anxiety of atomic bomb with the family’s financial concern by disguising it as ‘family drama’, the director effectively presents the essential critical mind of atomic bomb threatening lives. Moreover, observing Nakajima’s ‘fear’ in the third-party position of a doctor Harada, the director objectively materializes Nakajima’s abstract warning of atomic bomb.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
