인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This essay examines how Coetzee"s Disgrace embodies a mode of reflectivity, requiring a reflective distance to the conventional understanding of human life and relationships. In its high-minded pursuit of moral substance, some prior criticism on Disgrace tends to downplay the reader"s role in interpretation, reducing the work’s meaning on the context from which it arose, overlooking the text’s aesthetic form. By contrast, this paper suggests Disgrace’s meaning is not exhausted by its original context, also proposing the text’s ethical issues and problems are not confined only in the work’s moral content, but inseparably related to the text’s form. In advancing this view, this essay examines how this novel shows that the complexity of Lurie"s existence infiltrates the very form of the work, not just its content. Against some critics’ complaining that the work’s ethical dimension of the form does not provide moral guidance to our concrete lives, this paper views the work’s aesthetic reticence to engage in active ethical normativeness as the work’s deliberate narrative strategy to alert the main character reflectively to the complexities of human life and condition beyond problem solving attitude of life, as Lurie by and large fleshes out his moral case, for example, turning it into his own mode of fictional opera. Coetzee"s work, in which the formal and moral notably hard to separate, in turn sensitizes readers reflectively to the intricacies of moral issues of the work.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-740-001803283
