메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(영남대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제29권 제1집(통권 제61집)
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    The discussion that the right to silence applies to not only criminal procedure but also administrative procedure is in progress. It is generally believed that there is no right to silence on administrative or civil responsibility. But Article 12 of the Constitution about the right to silence should apply to the administrative procedure if it is connected with criminal responsibility.
    For the Charter on duty payer rights to protect taxpayers from customs duty investigation, namely corporation screening, to have a practical effect, the notice of the right to silence, including refusal to submit data, should be preceded. Only by doing so can they avoid unreasonable compulsory statement demands for administrative purposes and stop the shift to unfair tax offense investigation. Concerns about weakening administrative power due to the refusal to submit the data are already determined by the circumstances as expected under the related statutes. Because the customs act plans to punish those who refuse to submit data to the authorities to a comparatively slight degree and it is prescribed the preliminary tax offense investigation in case of the refusal to submit data.
    In exceptional cases, when it is necessary to go through the process of transferring to tax offense investigation, not only it is required to obtain the approval from the committee but also a systematic device should be devised to prevent the use of the statements or data at the previous customs duty investigation in the transferred tax offense investigation.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기