인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
As a whole, the amendment proposals for the entire legislature are not entirely consistent with systematic and logical coherence, and there are many cases in which the obligation of the employer and the object of the safety and health management are greatly reduced rather than the current law. In addition, there are a few cases that do not conform to the legislative ideology of the occupational safety and health law and the principles of safety and health management.
We can not define crimes and punishment as arbitrators, but only criminal acts should be criminal. If a certain act is defined as a crime, there must be reasonable grounds. From this point of view, the revised proposals all extend beyond the scope of the concept and duty of the employer and the contractor, so that they do not take into consideration differences in the nature of labor contracts, contracts and contracts. From another viewpoint, there are many provisions in the revised text that define criminal acts that violate ethics and moral codes or cause harm to others only indirectly without harming others directly. However, criminalization of acts that should be moralized and merely ethically blamed is excessive criminalization.
In addition, not all of the contents of the subordinate statute of the amendment have been prescribed in advance, so the law does not regulate concrete contents, and as a result, the people who have the ability to judge the average judge the scope of the act It can not be predicted what kind. In addition, there are few cases that violate the principle of boldness and overbearing as the focus is on expanding the duty of the employer and strengthening punishment.
Therefore, if the legislative notice is passed without any amendment, it is expected that it will be involved in the unconstitutional lawsuit as soon as it is enforced and it will continue to be confused for a considerable period of time. And the criminal law has a lot of theoretical problems in the state of the law and the normative force is greatly damaged. As a result, it is feared that the perception that the Industrial Safety and Health Act is a law that can not be practically violated will be widespread throughout society. And the excessive expansion of the scope of the mandate can not only protect the target to be protected but also lead to the weakening of the protection of the core target.
In order to avoid problems like this, the entire framework of the amendment should be elaborated again after thorough discussion and examination. In order to do this, it is necessary to have enough opinions and discussions on each side in the attitude that all revisions should be made.
We can not define crimes and punishment as arbitrators, but only criminal acts should be criminal. If a certain act is defined as a crime, there must be reasonable grounds. From this point of view, the revised proposals all extend beyond the scope of the concept and duty of the employer and the contractor, so that they do not take into consideration differences in the nature of labor contracts, contracts and contracts. From another viewpoint, there are many provisions in the revised text that define criminal acts that violate ethics and moral codes or cause harm to others only indirectly without harming others directly. However, criminalization of acts that should be moralized and merely ethically blamed is excessive criminalization.
In addition, not all of the contents of the subordinate statute of the amendment have been prescribed in advance, so the law does not regulate concrete contents, and as a result, the people who have the ability to judge the average judge the scope of the act It can not be predicted what kind. In addition, there are few cases that violate the principle of boldness and overbearing as the focus is on expanding the duty of the employer and strengthening punishment.
Therefore, if the legislative notice is passed without any amendment, it is expected that it will be involved in the unconstitutional lawsuit as soon as it is enforced and it will continue to be confused for a considerable period of time. And the criminal law has a lot of theoretical problems in the state of the law and the normative force is greatly damaged. As a result, it is feared that the perception that the Industrial Safety and Health Act is a law that can not be practically violated will be widespread throughout society. And the excessive expansion of the scope of the mandate can not only protect the target to be protected but also lead to the weakening of the protection of the core target.
In order to avoid problems like this, the entire framework of the amendment should be elaborated again after thorough discussion and examination. In order to do this, it is necessary to have enough opinions and discussions on each side in the attitude that all revisions should be made.
#과잉금지의 원칙
#규범력
#산업안전보건법
#안전보건관리
#책임주의
#principle of prohibition of excess
#regulatory strength
#occupational safety and health law
#safety and health management
#liability principle
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 체계상의 문제점
- Ⅲ. 내용상의 문제점
- Ⅳ. 현행법보다 후퇴한 부분
- Ⅴ. 처벌규정의 문제점
- Ⅵ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-336-002056284
