개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Due to terrorist attacks by the world jihadists movement that followed the September 11 attacks, the word “Islam” hardly conjures up the principle of tolerance in the minds of most non-Muslims of our time. If one were to ask the average Korean or any non-Muslim the question: “Which of the world’s religions is the most intolerant?,” the most likely answer would be Islam.
However, quite contrary to most non-Muslims’ negative views of Islam, many Muslim and non-Muslim scholars including Sir Hamilton Gibb, Sir Thomas Arnold, Fazlur Rahman and Mahmoud Ayoub, characterize the religion of Islam as a tolerant religion. According to them, Islam possesses a magnificent tradition of interracial and interreligious understanding and cooperation.
Yet, through an insidious symbiosis between fanatical Muslims and hysterical Islamophobes, the very opposite image of Islam as one of the most malevolent stereotypes of our times has emerged.
According to the interpretations of many Muslim scholars, the Quran, which is considered the foundation of both divine law and metaphysical knowledge for Muslims, presents a universal and an inclusive perspective of a divine being that responds to the sincerity and commitment. Among scriptures, the Quran uniquely developed awareness of religious plurality, even appearing to offer a rationale for the existence of competing religions as shown in Surah 5:48.
Nevertheless, the Quran also includes verses that state that Islam is the only way to God. Though the statements by the Quran are not fully consistent on the matter of interreligious relationships and religious plurality, this is due to particular circumstances and issues between Muslims and the people of the Book (which include Jews and Christians).
Therefore, the verses must be interpreted in relation to specific political situations between Muhammad and the Jews of Medina or neighboring Christians. Thus, such verses should not be referred by neither Muslims nor non-Muslims in order to negate the positive verses of the Quran, which are more numerous and emphatic in their insistence on mutual recognition.
To conclude, the Quran, the foundation on which the religion of Islam is based, challenges us in a time of discrimination, exclusiveness and conflict, by maintaining that we all have faith in one God and compete with one another righteously and respectfully.
However, quite contrary to most non-Muslims’ negative views of Islam, many Muslim and non-Muslim scholars including Sir Hamilton Gibb, Sir Thomas Arnold, Fazlur Rahman and Mahmoud Ayoub, characterize the religion of Islam as a tolerant religion. According to them, Islam possesses a magnificent tradition of interracial and interreligious understanding and cooperation.
Yet, through an insidious symbiosis between fanatical Muslims and hysterical Islamophobes, the very opposite image of Islam as one of the most malevolent stereotypes of our times has emerged.
According to the interpretations of many Muslim scholars, the Quran, which is considered the foundation of both divine law and metaphysical knowledge for Muslims, presents a universal and an inclusive perspective of a divine being that responds to the sincerity and commitment. Among scriptures, the Quran uniquely developed awareness of religious plurality, even appearing to offer a rationale for the existence of competing religions as shown in Surah 5:48.
Nevertheless, the Quran also includes verses that state that Islam is the only way to God. Though the statements by the Quran are not fully consistent on the matter of interreligious relationships and religious plurality, this is due to particular circumstances and issues between Muslims and the people of the Book (which include Jews and Christians).
Therefore, the verses must be interpreted in relation to specific political situations between Muhammad and the Jews of Medina or neighboring Christians. Thus, such verses should not be referred by neither Muslims nor non-Muslims in order to negate the positive verses of the Quran, which are more numerous and emphatic in their insistence on mutual recognition.
To conclude, the Quran, the foundation on which the religion of Islam is based, challenges us in a time of discrimination, exclusiveness and conflict, by maintaining that we all have faith in one God and compete with one another righteously and respectfully.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 꾸란과 종교적 다양성
Ⅲ. 꾸란과 종교간의 대화
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이슬람과 기독교 신론 비교연구
ACTS 신학저널
2017 .01
-
십자가 수난을 중심으로 한 이슬람의 예수 이해
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2018 .09
-
국내 무슬림 전도와 양육방안
미션네트워크
2018 .02
-
내국인 무슬림 공동체에 대한 선교적 이해 : 이슬람의 한국 선교 (Da’wah): 어제와 오늘
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2017 .03
-
Mission Strategy for Islam
선교신학
2017 .08
-
도전받는 정의:이슬람을 중심으로
선교신학
2015 .11
-
한국 내 할랄 식품을 둘러싼 갈등 구조에 대한 선교적 이해
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2016 .09
-
파키스탄의 이슬람과 국내 파키스탄 이주민의 이슬람 성향
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2021 .12
-
No Other Face of Islam? : A Short Study of Liberal Islam
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2016 .09
-
현대 카자흐스탄의 생활이슬람의 양상과 전망― 청년 무슬림의 종교 의식과 활동을 중심으로 ―
러시아어문학연구논집
2019 .01
-
종교개혁자들의 이슬람
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2017 .03
-
중국 이슬람의 확산과 이슬람의 중국화
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2021 .12
-
중세 그리스도교의 이슬람 대응: 이슬람 문명권, 비잔티움, 라틴 그리스도교세계의 비교
한국교회사학회지
2016 .12
-
종교간 대화와 협력에 관한 연구: 이슬람교에 대한 한국교회 선교방향 모색
신학사상
2017 .01
-
반목과 충돌의 시대 속의 이슬람 선교
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2015 .07
-
아프리카의 기독교와 이슬람
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2015 .12
-
순니 3대 신학파에 대한 분석과 선교적 성찰
선교신학
2018 .05
-
이슬람의 신학적 도전과 교회의 대응 방안: 이슬람 포교지들을 중심으로
성경과 신학
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0