메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
유달승 (한국외국어대학교) 이지은 (한국외국어대학교) 황의룡 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제27권 제3호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2018.6
수록면
113 - 125 (13page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2018.06.27.2.113

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to review the research trends of the Western society in terms of the flow and development of the theory of play as a cultural act.
According to the ancient philosopher Plato, play was non-essential and was related to the pleasure of senses, but it motivated childhood education. Another philosopher Aristotle regarded play as a secondary activity to diligent labor. Rituals in the ancient society were a play in its purest form. However, as play accompanied leisurely activities later on thereby encompassing psychological elements, it gradually became a symbol of mystical realization of cultures.
In the middle ages, religious issue significantly influenced the scope of play. This resulted in play, which played an essential role in both cultural and social areas, to be excluded from research subjects which usually had to be studied with an in-depth approach. However, the value of play was rediscovered by humanists in the Renaissance period, settling as one of the values of physical education.
Johan Huizinga, who reviewed historical theory of play from a skeptical perspective in the modern era, argued that ‘Homo Ludens’ is closer to the human nature rather than ‘Homo Sapiens’ or ‘Homo Faber’. Because Roger Caillois analyzed social phenomenon as a part of various criterions of play, he was more realistic than Johan Huizinga regarding play. The biggest achievement of Roger Caillois was that he provided a key for a more systematic classification of play, but as Huizinga gave prominence to play that it functions in creating cultures while it was being derogated, play could finally be publicly recognized in the modern world.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 서구사회 유희론의 흐름과 전개
Ⅲ. 근현대사회와 유희론의 동향
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-692-003140375