지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The survey of Ulleungdo was conducted eight times between June 1899 and December 1905 in Korean Empire period. Investigators were government officials, including customs officials, Japanese Foreign Ministry officials and police, and Korean government officials. The custom’s commissioner Laporte surveyed in June 1899 found that the Japanese exported timber and grain to Japan but did not pay tariffs other than the commission paid to intermediary merchants. The current status of the smuggling of the Japanese was also revealed in the September 1899 survey.
In June 1900, the Korean Empire and the Japanese government conducted a joint investigation, and the Korean Empire government asked the Japanese government to withdraw the Japanese on Ulleungdo, but the Japanese did not withdraw. The Korean Empire elevated Ulleungdo to Uldo county, placed an county magistrate, and recognized the right of tax administration. In the 1901 survey, it was revealed that the Japanese were not exporting tariffs but were extracting resources. In 1902, the Korean Empire government enacted the “Uldogun Jeolmok(鬱島郡節目, Administrative Guidelines governing Uldo County)”, and imposed 1% tariff on Japanese export cargo. The Japanese exploitation of the resources was the addition of fish from timber and grain, and in 1904 sea lions were added to the export. The sea lion at this time refers to sea lion of Liangko Island(sea lion of Dokdo). In 1905, sea lion scraps and canned abalone were added.
In 1905, there were about 3,500 Koreans living in Ulleungdo, and about 300-350 Japanese. In 1905, the number of exports was soybeans, wood, dried abalone, squid and sea lion, all of which were exported directly from Ulleungdo to Japan. Since the Japanese normally exported the cargo without paying the customs duties, the more the trade volume between Ulleungdo and Japan increased, the more the exploitation of resources became worse. Ulleungdo was surveyed every year from 1899 to 1905, especially in 1904 and 1905. This means the situation that the Japanese government tried to cope with the resources to invade in Ulleungdo as the resources of Ulleungdo were depleted.
In June 1900, the Korean Empire and the Japanese government conducted a joint investigation, and the Korean Empire government asked the Japanese government to withdraw the Japanese on Ulleungdo, but the Japanese did not withdraw. The Korean Empire elevated Ulleungdo to Uldo county, placed an county magistrate, and recognized the right of tax administration. In the 1901 survey, it was revealed that the Japanese were not exporting tariffs but were extracting resources. In 1902, the Korean Empire government enacted the “Uldogun Jeolmok(鬱島郡節目, Administrative Guidelines governing Uldo County)”, and imposed 1% tariff on Japanese export cargo. The Japanese exploitation of the resources was the addition of fish from timber and grain, and in 1904 sea lions were added to the export. The sea lion at this time refers to sea lion of Liangko Island(sea lion of Dokdo). In 1905, sea lion scraps and canned abalone were added.
In 1905, there were about 3,500 Koreans living in Ulleungdo, and about 300-350 Japanese. In 1905, the number of exports was soybeans, wood, dried abalone, squid and sea lion, all of which were exported directly from Ulleungdo to Japan. Since the Japanese normally exported the cargo without paying the customs duties, the more the trade volume between Ulleungdo and Japan increased, the more the exploitation of resources became worse. Ulleungdo was surveyed every year from 1899 to 1905, especially in 1904 and 1905. This means the situation that the Japanese government tried to cope with the resources to invade in Ulleungdo as the resources of Ulleungdo were depleted.
목차
〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. 여는 말
Ⅱ. 칙령 제41호 제정 이전의 울릉도 현지조사
Ⅲ. 칙령 제41호 이후의 울릉도 조사
Ⅳ. 1905년 독도 편입 후의 울릉도 조사
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
AUTHOR GUIDELINES 외
농약과학회지
2020 .03
-
빅데이터 분석기법을 활용한 경관 가이드라인 분석
한국경관학회지
2020 .01
-
Guideline for naming of plant diseases in Korean
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .10
-
시군 단위 농작물의 고온해 위험 예측분포도 서비스
한국농림기상학회 학술발표논문집
2019 .01
-
성향점수매칭을 통한 제주지역 자율관리어업의 효과 분석
수산해양교육연구
2023 .10
-
Antioxidant Capacities of the Sunchang County Specialities and the Medicinal Crops
한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집
2016 .10
-
장수군 학교숲에 대한 교사들의 반응 및 개선방향
한국산림휴양학회 학술발표회 자료집
2015 .10
-
장수군 마을숲의 문제점과 개선방향
한국산림휴양학회 학술발표회 자료집
2015 .04
-
현장조사를 통한 경관가이드라인 적용에 관한 연구 - 송도 1공구 공공주택지구 중심으로
한국경관학회지
2021 .12
-
Guidelines for Dietary Education Based on Seaweeds
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2020 .07
-
Ascospore monitoring of marssonina blotch of apple at Geochang county in Korea
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .10
-
순창군 봄배추의 지역 생산성 특성 검정
한국원예학회 학술발표요지
2019 .10
-
해남군 수산자원증강사업의 경제성 분석 : 바지락, 해삼, 꼬막의 방류를 중심으로
수산해양교육연구
2022 .04
-
Current status of jujube witches’ broom in Boeun county and control efficacy of oxytetracycline via trunk injection
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .10
-
Guidelines of Efficacy Evaluation of Functional for Menopausal Women’s and Men’s Health
한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집
2019 .10
-
Comparison of Targeted Population Subgroups in Food-Based Dietary Guidelines Around the World
한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집
2018 .10
-
잔류성 시험용 HPLC의 Validation Guideline 제언
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017 .11
-
Reflection on the WHO’s guideline on NSS from the perspective of Korean consumers
한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집
2023 .10
-
Review on Biopesticide Test Guidelines in OECD Countries
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2023 .11
-
폐금속 광산의 영향을 받는 농경지 토양 내 금속성분 오염의 공간적 분포특성: 충청남도 부여군의 사례연구
한국농공학회논문집
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-454-003122902